Timing belt issue

1990 Mazda Miata. Changed out the timing belt yesterday and in the process got the cams off. Had the cams clamped in place and tied together but the wrenches slipped. I know, should of also marked the gears. After getting the belt on we aligned it by the cam marks but it seems to be running rough and pinging alot when there is a load on it, driving. What other way is there to adjust the cams? Thanks.
Reply to
Mac
Loading thread data ...

See if this helps:

formatting link

Reply to
XS11E

The two times I have done this (a 1.6 and a 1.8) I was disappointed with the ease and accuracy of the alignment marks. There's too much distance between the marks and looking at different angles can easily give you a one tooth difference. My guess is that you are off one tooth, Look it over real good and move it the direction that looks most likely. I'm thinking that will be pretty obvious as going the other direction (from the point you are) will look pretty obviously off.

Seems to me that Mazda could have done significantly better on this issue.

Chris

99BBB
Reply to
Chris D'Agnolo

All taken care of. we found the right marks and corrected the issue. runs a lot better now.

Reply to
Mac

I know my limitations>>LOL. When it comes time for my 2000 Miata, I will give it to a PRO. Strange here in Calif. it says to replace at 105,000, but to check it at 60,000. Well heck, it would take nearly just as much labor cost just to get to it to check it, that at that time I might as well have it done. but not sure at that time (60,000) if it really be worth also having the water pump replaced also, at 105K I would, but not 60K???!!! The car is only at 38K now

Reply to
moeshefrankenstein_1

it to a PRO. Strange here in Calif. it says to replace at 105,000, but to check it at 60,000. Well heck, it would take nearly just as much labor cost just to get to it to check it, that at that time I might as well have it done. but not sure at that time (60,000) if it really be worth also having the water pump replaced also, at 105K I would, but not 60K???!!! The car is only at 38K now

My 99 had it's belt, idler, tensioner, and water pump changed at about

60,000, mainly due to the fact that it's turbo'ed. The belt showed very slight signs of wear, with the teeth slightly more rounded than a brand new belt. The used belt was slightly longer than the new belt and prevented using the slide on replacement method. One idler or tensioner bearing was quite rough, so both were changed, since I had the parts in hand. The camshaft seals were not changed, since there was no sign of leakage. The crud filter on the underside of the cam cover was cleaned, as it had noticeable crud inside. Small low spots on the top of the head had pools of very yucky oil, so that was also removed.

Original assembly turned out to be one belt tooth off. To recover, I located TDC, checked against the various marks, and re assembled. Don't forget to use RTV when reinstalling the cam cover, particularly at the rear of the cover.

The big concern is to get the crank key really locked down. to this day, I'm not sure that some minor variation in timing might be caused by this. It's hard to tell, since the waste spark system can obscure timing light results. We also had to reuse the original key, since the key supplied by the Mazda dealer (30 miles away) didn't fit.

Read the service note concerning the changes from the original service manual about proper crank key installation and torques.

Reply to
charlie

Charlie>>All good points but nothing that I would ever consider doing myself leaving it to the PROs. Almost sounds like something that you should let the Miata dealer/service dept, do, rather than a general all around mechanic's shop, right??

Reply to
moeshefrankenstein_1

give it to a PRO. Strange here in Calif. it says to replace at 105,000, but to check it at 60,000. Well heck, it would take nearly just as much labor cost just to get to it to check it, that at that time I might as well have it done. but not sure at that time (60,000) if it really be worth also having the water pump replaced also, at 105K I would, but not 60K???!!! The car is only at 38K now

leaving it to the PROs. Almost sounds like something that you should let the Miata dealer/service dept, do, rather than a general all around mechanic's shop, right??

Let's just say that the "local" Mazda dealer is not known for "quality" service. The really experienced and well trained mechanics retired, or work someplace else. It's a small dealership, part of a large chain, and last I looked, didn't have all the "required" factory tools to work on Miata valve trains, and other things. (What shim kit, for one) When I changed the 5th gear ratio in my 99's 5 speed, I ended up borrowing a couple of specialty tools from one of the Toyota dealer's mechanics.

Reply to
charlie

Now you're scaring me>>LOL. When it comes time to have my valved checked/adjusted (Book says at 60,000 mi), should it be done at the Mazda dealership, or could any competent mechanic (Maybe recommended by "Click & Clack's" cartalk.com mechanic files, do that)??

Reply to
moeshefrankenstein_1

Charlie, You got my attention with your mention of changing the 5th gear ratio! I've been dreaming of such a modification for years and always get the same ridiculous answers from other people when I suggest such (apparent) blasphemy.

Tell me more please. Feel free to send me a direct emails if you prefer, I don't want to hijack this thread but, I really would like to discuss this with you.

Thanks, Chris

99BBBB
Reply to
Chris D'Agnolo

The 99s used the more or less "classic" Miata five speed. There were parts available in the Mazda warehouse in 2002 or so. Miata.net had some threads and info, at least before they reorganized. It's not difficult to do, but there was a problem that involved borrowing a tool (I ended up borrowing one from an ex Mazda mechanic that was working for the Toyota used car dealer.) It can be done without the tool with some difficulty.

I had to take the tranny apart to replace a bad syncro ring, so it was sort of worth while at the time. For the effort involved, I'd rather change the rear axle ratio. The reduction of a few hundred RPM at 70 Mph is not enough to really justify the 5th gear change by itself.

The cost of parts was about the same as changing the rear axle ratio. I believe the parts used for the gear change were for an older RX-7 model that had a small rotary engine.

There is a spare tranny sitting around that has the changed 5th gear ratio. No, I will not give it away. sadly, used 5 spd trannys go for about the cost of the parts for the gear change. Mazda wanted about 2k for a new one at a racers discount when I bought the spare.

Reply to
charlie

Thanks Charlie, I appreciate the info. Ya, I would not go thru that amount of work for a couple hundred rpm at 70. I'm looking for more like 1000 rpm reduction at 70! So, I imagine a rear end ratio tall enough to do that would make my little 1.8 noticeably slower in most situations. That's why I thought just changing the one ratio would be the answer.

Anyway, I did a tranny swap out this year and had noooo fun at all with it so, realistically, I think I'm giving up on this 'crazy' Miata idea of mine ;-) I still think it's a good one though, 5th gear 'for cruising only' ;-)

Later, cd

99BBB
Reply to
Chris D'Agnolo

The gear change did noticeably reduce the buzzyness a bit at 70Mph. Close as I could tell, the max RPM change was ~500, and the minimum about 250. We changed such things as speedo cal from the factory high reading setting to 1.5 or so miles high at 70, and also changed the tach to read more accurately, unfortunately in the middle of the whole process. The factory had set the tach to hide the fact that the redline computer cutout was actually lower than specified by a few hundred RPM. Mazda and Ford use the US -0 +5 speedo cal standard. Most read about 3 to 4 miles fast at 70 from the factory. GM (Chevrolet) seems to typically read about one mile high at 70.

The 5th gear change along with a turbo might increase the 1/4 mile end speed a bit. (Mostly the turbo) The last time I ran the 99 on a strip (2002), the results were consistent with 200-220 HP. The guy in the other lane was running a stock V8 small block Camaro auto, and ended up a ways behind. I backed off just a bit before the light, to keep the track happy with a convertible and no roll bar. The Miata rear wheels like to "hop" with stock suspension, and this slows down the 60' speed. To add insult the 99 is a bit heavy, due to added sound deadening and the things that go with the turbo.

Reply to
charlie

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.