Obviously, the bigger the number the better. (I suspect Pete M might win this one.)
My results here
Obviously, the bigger the number the better. (I suspect Pete M might win this one.)
My results here
11369 - you need to drive more miles!!
I got 6348kg/year :-)
Mike P
2858kg/year
That site is crap though it refuses to acknowledge the existence of most of my cars.
Pah- measely 6642kg/yr. I need to get a bigger engine or acouple of them!
tim..
13490kg / year.....
Of course, this is only using the Passat's details and doesn't include the 75 or bikes.
913, I'm not even trying :(
5871kg / year But they don't include the aero, so I had to use the anniversary.
I don't think so :-D
TDM
Same here.
According to that if I do 15k miles a year I win.
Big time. 3509243 kg/year in the 4.6.
The turbo isn't listed.
If I do 50k miles a year, that gives me a stunning, and quite frankly very enjoyable 11697477 kg/year.
Oh, that's enough to make me want to put a sticker in the window with it on.
That looks a bit wrong to me.
Looks incredibly wrong to me as well, but check it out.
50000 miles, 94-02 Range Rover 4.6 HSE Auto.
Aye, still looks wrong.
I reckon you've broken it.
35739 but it should depend on how you drive, and if motorway or stationary in town.
Pathetic website doesn't find my current and just-previous machine.
It claims my carbon footprint is 7,315kg, then has the audacity to suggest I
*buy* a Passat 1.9 BlueMotion TDI.
Didn't list my Aero.
I ran it with the Vee, and it told me to buy a Panda :-)
Doesn't list the new acquisition if I enter the registration *or* try to select it as a model.
Useless. That was before it suggested a BlueMotion.
Any idea how many blueberry muffins I'd have to eat to pass a BlueMotion Passat.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.