Oh yeah? yeah? Go on then! Do your worst!
formatting link
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
OT 8mg digi cameras
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
Ouch, that's noisy.
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
Fuck me. What was that sunrise photo taken on? Looks worse than 800 speed film.
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
Email me
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
Send the raw!
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
Well its from the jpg rather than the reaw so it cant do as well but here you go, took 2 secs to do and 2 mins to upload...
formatting link
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
I did the jpg but it is better but still crap! ISO 3200 or worse??? There are limits on whats possible you know!
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
Yeah, it's not great. It was taken by my mate on one of those little MP4 camcorder things.
(It's either Coolangatta or Tweed Heads on Australia's Gold Coast, btw)
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
Yeah, I mean, I wouldn't judge any software on the processing of that pic - I was getting all excited with all there file extensions and things. Oh well. If I take a raw pic of something in Manchester this evening, I'll let you at it if you like!
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
Umm no, it depends on the mass of the camera, the moment of inertia around the lens/body and the technology used for the shutter and viewfinder.
SLRs are more difficult to keep steady with roller focal plane shutters and heavy mirrors giving more of a bash to the body than leaf focal plane shutters and between the lens leaf shutters impart almost no shake at all.
- Vote on answer
- posted
17 years ago
Aha.