Re: More car wonderings

Various sizes of the VTEC, yes. But they're not a direct comparison as they're comparatively gutless until the VTEC kicks in.

Reply to
SteveH
Loading thread data ...

There's no low coolant warning, only a temp guage and it goes north really quick - mine dropped a hose on the M1 and I lost a gasket then - at about

90k miles, got it done properly and sold it at 160k miles for 500 quid, only paid 2000 for it with 60k miles on so it cost me 2p/mile depreciation. Which is the one statistic that made it better than an SL55AMG.
Reply to
Tim S Kemp

And subarus. And the BMW straight six. And the VW 1.8. Any more?

Reply to
Tim S Kemp

Non-turbo Scooby made 120bhp. Non-Turbo VAG 1.8 a bit more, not sure about the BMW, but I'm sure it wasn't the thick end of 160bhp.

Reply to
SteveH

Oh sorry, we're measuring by bhp and you're excluding the Hondas? What year was it?

Reply to
Tim S Kemp

1995.

For a N/A 2lt it was _almost_ at the head of the pack. The Mi16 ran it close, Honda were in the same ball-park. No-one else was close.

Reply to
SteveH

Honda were first getting 160bhp from a 1.6 in 1989, reliably too... and half the point with VTEC is you're maintaining half decent power and economy lower down, as well has having out and out manic power higher up.

Vauxhall were getting 156bhp from a 2.0 16v N/A in 1988, again reliably, and with big power gains easily extracted for not all that much cash.

Reply to
JackH

In news: snipped-for-privacy@individual.net, JackH decided to enlighten our sheltered souls with a rant as follows

Ford RS2000 Mk5. 150bhp 1992.

Reply to
Pete M

Found it - 1995 in the 155 2.0 16V 150bhp @ 6000rpm... so 75bhp/l

1995 318is had a 1.8 16v pushin 140bhp, 77.7bhp/l. 1995 320is had a 2.0 24v with variable timeing and pushing 150bhp / 190N - oh it was rear drive too unlike the alfa... 1995 Mitsubishi Galant - 2.0, 147bhp. 1995 prelude vtect 2.2 - 183 bhp = 83bhp/l and was nice to drive too
Reply to
Tim S Kemp

1990ish - 405 Mi16 1.9 - 160bhp - 84bhp/litre 1993ish - 106 Rallye 1.3 - 100bhp - 77bhp/litre
Reply to
DanTXD

1995 BMW M3 3.0 286bhp = 95bhp/l 1995 Maserati Ghible 2.0 306 bhp (1996 had 335), used turbochargers though 1996 Volvo 850 2.0 143bhp none turbo Lots of turbo metal... Volvo T4 (192 bhp) etc.
Reply to
Tim S Kemp

1991 Civic 1.6 VTi - 160bhp - 100bhp/litre.

I like... I want :-)

Reply to
JackH

Surely it's a lower insurance group than the SL55 AMG as well?

All this reminds me of my Fiesta van, the first relatively modern vehicle (

Reply to
AstraVanMan

1995 ?

Er, the 1.9 165bhp Mi16 lump was around in 1989 !

Reply to
Nom

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.