I suppose it all depends on what one thinks SVT's purpose is. I believe it's purpose is to provide reasonably priced, well engineered, nicely styled, and mostly balanced performance cars in order to improve a nameplate's exposure in the marketplace. All that's great for the enthusiast but the point is to sell more base models and provide something at a reasonable price. Saleen and Roush are the high dollar alternatives that provide something else (not always better engineering or performance) and SVT is supposed to, imho, fit in between the base modesl and these, leaning more toward performance than styling.
We can play games all day about buying this and building that for a lot less money. So what? It will turn out to be exactly what was paid for: rough riding, hard to drive in many circumstances, and low on amenities. But it would be *fast* and if that's all a car is supposed to be, go for it. I'll argue that that's not the demographic interested in SVT products. It is an ancillary target demographic for the results of SVT's engineering via trickle down, but that's it. There's a large enthusiast base that want speed, performance, *and* comfort and amenities. They are willing to pay for it. . Dan
2003 Cobra convertible With some stuff and things