ccc> Jack D. Russell, Sr. wrote: >> Right... go right ahead Hotshot, and use away. You've given new >> meaning to the term "THICK".
ccc> Mr. Russell,
ccc> What is your problem? If I choose to disagree with your point of ccc> view, so be it! I was simply pointing out that Porsche would need ccc> to spend some serious cash to control every variation of the name ccc> that they so justly own. You want to see "THICK"? Go look in the ccc> mirror. Did you even consider looking up any of the names that I ccc> posted? Are you pissed because you misinterpreted my original ccc> post and you don't have the guts to say "sorry, I thought you were ccc> a spammer and I was wrong"? Huh?
ccc> BTW, I cringed (literally) at being called a spammer. That was a ccc> first.
ccc> Have a fantastic day Sir!
*I'm sorry.* In the heat of the discussion, I didn't even bother to check the headers. I (evidently wrongly) assumed that cha_cha_cha was a sock puppet for ]-[erc. It's hard to imagine anyone that is involved with any of the Porsche communities that isn't aware of Porsche AG's position where it involves any misuse of their name. There is no maybe about it. They can, and do pursue any violation that they're aware of regardless of the costs involved. No, I didn't bother to look up any of the names that you posted. There's no need to. If anyone tries to misuse them, Porsche will stop them. Simple as that. You can disagree with that till the cows come home, but it won't change anything. I plan to "Have a fantastic day ". You do the same.