To Turn, Or Not To Turn?

Jan 20, 2006 5 Replies

I have a 2004 Impreza 2.5 TS Wagon (automatic), that is approaching 60,000 miles. I had the brakes checked today (Friday), and was told that both the fronts and backs were down to 5 percent, and need to be done ASAP. I set up an appointment for this to be done on Monday. This is at an independent garage.



I am thiking of telling them not to turn the rotors if this is at all possible. I have never had a good outcome from having rotors turned, and have usually wound up having to buy new rotors anyway. They just get a pulsation a short while after they are turned.



Does anyone have any opinions or experiences on this?


Any slight uneveness/waviness in the rotors the pads will wear into after a few stops. Assuming you have no issues now with the rotors, just put pads on. I had an '81 Civic wagon that I sold at 120K with original rotors. It had MANY sets of pads as it was mostly surface street driven.

ymmv

Carl

Turning rotors leaves you with a thinner cross section of material, which distorts ( warps) more readily than the thicker original equipment. I picked up a set of cross drilled rotors on Ebay ( made in China ) excellent quality for about $10 each. I've got about 10k miles on them now and they're smooth and function well. Installation was a cakewalk, as I've done lots of brake jobs over the years and Subie's design is excellent from a maintenance perspective. Recently did a VW jetta and an Accord - what a pain in the Ass ! Subie's rule !

I recently had to replace the front disks in my daughter's '93 Accord (I hadn't been watching the brakes closely enough). The drive axles have to come 99% out (they don't have to be pulled out of the transaxle, just to where they can be pulled out) to get the rotors out! Aargh!

Mike

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required