Debating which would be the better.
The Av seems to be popular, well built, well, equipped, and fast.
The Lincoln is interesting in its own ways.
Anyone tried both yet? I hear the Linc is a bit wheezy under the hood.
Debating which would be the better.
The Av seems to be popular, well built, well, equipped, and fast.
The Lincoln is interesting in its own ways.
Anyone tried both yet? I hear the Linc is a bit wheezy under the hood.
Yeah, because nobody's buying them. :-)
Last time we had a Mercury Zephyr was a brand new one in 1980
I'm surprized they had the BALLS to revive the nameplate! People must be running away from the showrooms (Or at least those of us that remember the LAST Zephyr model...)
Why would anybody of sound mind even contemplate basing their opinion of any vehicle on what is on the market today with what was available many years ago? Should I judge all new Toyotas by my first Toyota? ;)
mike hunt
One should be comparing the Zephyr to the Camry, not the Avalon. The Zephyr competes in size with the Camry but with more standard equipment than a similarly priced Camry. The Zyphyr is many thousands less than a base Avalon that has less equipment. The Fords to compare with the Avalon are the larger 500 and the Montigo. But again even those are larger but even less expensive, they are available in AWD for at least $6,000 less than the Avalon FWD.
mike hunt
You forgot to say "in my opinion."
The Camry has more head room (front and rear), similar leg room, more shoulder room and has a bigger trunk. The Camry SE-V6 has a power-to-weight ratio similar to the Zephyr and gets better gas mileage. What's not so comparable there?
You can get a fancier stereo in the Zephyr but, so what? I can buy one at Curcuit City with the $4K I save on the Camry up front and on the better gas mileage and on repairs I won't be purchasing.
But, that's just me. Enjoy your Zephyr!
Heck, the Camry looks good compared to the Five Hundred, too. I've posted on that, previously.
Of course, again, that's just my opinon - backed up by facts.
Isn't that the reason why Ford and GM keep changing car names? That's due to the poor reputation of that particular name.
Why would any company be stupid enuf to resurrect a brand name when the original model sucked. That was his point.
Reach FURTHER BACK into history, Artie.
The 1939 Lincoln Zephyr was a great car in its day. LOL
mike hunt
I don't know, but I'm sure that is why Toyota no longer sells the Toyopet. LOL
PS At least I got my money back
mike hunt
The original poster was comparing the Avalon and the Zephyr. I not sure what comparison to which you are referring, size or price, of the Zephyr to the Camry or the 500. There is only one model, and three options, for the Zephyr. As to size comparison the 500 is bigger than the others and less expensive than either.
mike hunt
With respect to the Zephyr and the Camry, I wrote: "The Camry has more head room (front and rear), similar leg room, more shoulder room and has a bigger trunk. The Camry SE-V6 has a power-to-weight ratio similar to the Zephyr and gets better gas mileage."
That's a comparison based on the functional interior space, performance and fuel economy. I didn't bother to say anything about price but the Camry's going to be about $6k less, according to Edmunds TMV.
So, you can compare the Zephyr to the Camry and, for $6K extra on the Zephyr, you get wood trim and a better radio. Or you can compare the Avalon to the Zephyr and, for about the same price, the Avalon is a bigger car with similar trim and better fuel mileage.
Your choice.
As regards the Camry and the Five Hundred:
Where are you getting your pricing information? According to Edmunds, the Five Hundred is not "less expensive than either," as the Camry's MSRP is $2500 less than the Five Hundred and Edmunds puts their TMV, after rebates at $2k less for the Camry.
I can't see purchasing a Five Hundred or a Zephyr over a Camry.
Of course, that's just me. I buy a car for transportation. I select one based on capacities, capabilities, needs and the likelihood that it will be entirely trouble-free (my experience with Toyotas) or at least mostly trouble free but easy to fix when something does go wrong (my experience with 4-cylinder Volvos). I don't buy a car because I'm trying to prove something. I don't feel a need to spend extra for a high-status brand badge or a hot quarter mile to compensate for something else.
You are right. I should have said previous version.
Um, I think the ToyoPet is still available in other parts of the world...
At least, it was a few years ago.
Maybe the name but certainly not the car. Goodness what an awful things the first ones were. They where built on a truck chassis because nothing available in Japan at the time would hold up to use in the US.. My friend now departed owned a Dodge dealership and was taking on Toyota. If I recall it was around 1958, he asked me to take one for the invoice price of $600 to get some on the road and he would buy it back any time within in a year for the same amount. I was not my only vehicle, but I gave it back to him in six months. He sons run the dealership today in Allentown Pa and advertise it as Toyota oldest dealership in the US.
mike hunt
Exactly correct one must compare vehicle by size and price. The Camry is clearly better than the Zephry in that comparison but when you load up the Camry to compare in content to the Zephy, it becomes the better buy. The Zephry is cleary better than the Avalon. The 500 is clearly better than the Camry when price is considered. ;)
mike hunt
They were so poorly made that Toyota took the remaining lot of them and did not return to the US for another 8 years!
But, when they came back, they came back with a vengance. You will recall, at that time, getting 100,000 out of a car was a Good Thing. The Corollas would go 100,000 with very few problems. As demands for higher mileage came, Toyota rose to the challenge.
Problem was, even into the '70's they were fairly 'disposable' cars; when something finally DID go wrong, it did so in a Big Way. But the worst problem, for those of us in the Norteast, was Rust. The engine and tranny would run forever, as you drive down the street watching flakes fall off the car! The worst one I had personally was a '72 Corona MkII. Hell of a car, but the rails that comrpise the 'frame' rusted right through!
Not too suprisingly, there are STILL some of those old Coronas on the streets of southern California. Yeah, it's nearly always some Mexican driving it but ... the car's still rollin'.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.