OT CIA didn¹t do enough to stop 9/11, report finds

Heh, no mention whatsoever of Clinton.

Yes it did. The report goes back to 1998. Who was the president in

No mention of Clinton at all. You didn't read the article, just the headline. If you disagree, go to the web page and copy & paste the text where the president is mentioned.

LOL, conversing with you is like roller skating in a gravel pit.

Ok, the president was Bill Clinton, does that ring a bell?

The article was about the CIA, not the presidency. Speaking of bells....., oh..., nevermind, I was thinking bats. ;)

OK. The governor of New York was a Republican at that time. It was his fault, you drunk.

Actually it mentioned that "No comprehensive report focusing on bin Laden was written after 1993..."

That is quite specific enough.

LOL

Whoa, that's really an apt analogy; great imagery. That *is* what it's like! IMO, of course.

Cathy

Everyone knows billy was busy doing other things and obviously not watching Terrorism & the CIA except when he cut their legs out. Just proves fooling around at work does affect your job.

After 1993, and subsequent events which generated impotent Clinton threats of reprisal, you can certainly finger-point at his intentional ineffectiveness.

But he's not alone. There have been major, major blunders in the Middle East by every sitting president for the past 45 years. None are without blame.

Everyone knows that, except dbu.