North Korea's leader ain't all crazy. The guy's trying to push the Bush administration into wrapping up this war we're in. He knows we can't handle two things at once.
OT Crazy On You
Jul 06, 2006
21 Replies
Wanna bet?
Look at WWII.
Frankly, I don't understand what the hubbub is all about over NK. They ain't got no stinking A-bomb and will never have one. Their missiles are short range and just fall in the water or blow up. Bush is right again we'll just sit on it and let the NK starve.
Korea's missiles are about as dependable as Germany's buzzbombs were. But maybe they're holding their best for last. Who knows..
We've had a lot of base closings and some short sighted assurances of no draft. That's my opinion. A anti-terrorist specialist was on television and he was asked about our capability to fight in two different areas and he said doubtful. He also said Russia and China are making weak statements against Korea for fear of a economic retaliation. Rice said, and I agree with her, hey Europe, it's in your backyard, you take care of it.
His brother, Mint Lee Il, is in charge of their missile program. He is the nut LOL
mike
Oh?
Ever heard of nukes?
I wonder if the failure of two of their 'long dong silvers' had anything to do with the US Navy and Navy Seals being in the area?
Pretty much like he's done with Iraq, eh?
You meant cruise missiles didn't you?
No. Once again you are wrong. Iraq was a terrorist nation, harboring terrorists, creating WMD and storing them. It's leader, saddam was himself an experienced terrorist. Iraq was a threat to it's neighbors, to us and to the other peace loving nations of this world. GWB was correct in removing this threat.
North Korea on the other hand is isolated from the world and it's neighbors. It's economy is in shambles and has to import most all of it's food and other necessary goods. Yes it has missiles, but limited natural resources, (no oil), including clean water, it is dependent on imported food and other important goods, it has no means to pay for these products. In time it's leader will be replaced by a more reasonable person who will determine that it is in their best interest to seek peace and partnership with the U.S. and the rest of the world. The threat will dissolve without military action needed.
Well, I'm sure the USN was conducting war games in the waters not far from NK. We may even have a bird dedicated to watching NK.
That too....
Nukes on cruise missiles and maybe a good way to check out our ICBM's
Ok so we talk big but when faced with reality not too many want to see human suffering. We can't subject a population that can't rise against their leaders or vote them out. Let's be real about this. As far as testing things out, there's a huge ocean to the left and right of us and plenty of mothballed navel craft for targets. We do our best when actually attacked first. Do you agree?
What he is really trying to do is get the same addition to his checking account that we are offering to Iran.
Kim Jung Il has no ability to fight a war, certainly not one against the USA. His economy is in a shambles, and he needs -- that's desparately needs -- an infusion of cash.
He sees us offering a bundle to Iran, and he wants a bundle too. We gave him (his father, actually) a bundle in the mid-90s, and he promptly ignored the conditions and set out to build more nukes. Now, we are passing out bundles in Iran, and NK wants some. If we do nothing in NK, then we will be seriously weakened in our dealings with Iran. While "normal" people will recognize these two issues are not related, in the eyes of Iran and NK, the issue is precisely the same. If we give a bundle to Iran, then do nothing in NK, then Iran will not abide by the conditions under which we hand out the bundles. If we go after NK, and give a bundle to Iran, then NK will cry foul because we do something in one arena, and something else in the other.
Kim Jung Il has absolutely no interest in what is happening in Iraq or Afghanistan. He has a keen interest in Iran though.
We won't use a nuke against NK. We may deliver a few Cruise Missles, but I don't see any nukes going that way, unless one comes here first.
Sure.
The best way to do it your way is to vote in a Dim prez....
I do agree.....
We keep giving them economic incentives not to create such weapons. I have an incentive for him. Don't make nukes or anything else radioactive or we will nuke you, kill you all and let god sort you out.
Anybody that believes that the US Military can't handle two, three or four conflicts at once is sadly mistaken.....
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required