Much of this I ignore because it is such absurd B.S.
Which one is it?
It is BS the idea that we should assure the security of other nation's candidates, except under special conditions. Pakistan is not one of them.
We should keep their nuke arsenal on our target list however, just in case the country is taken over by the radical islamic such as was in Afghanistan.
Why not? You and your president think it's our business to ensure the security of entire countries. Why not just one person?
"JoeSpareBedroom"...
Your turn, Jeff.
Natalie, settling in with a bowl of popcorn, waiting for the show
I didn't see Fox News, I'd watched CNBC and they were talking about the Bhutto assassination all day as the DOW went down 192 points. Musharraf, not Bush, should have provided her with more protection but Musharraf may be the next one on the Al Qaeda hit list. Chaos, civil war, Islamic radicals, nuclear weapons not a good mix.
Add to the mix a moron of a president (Bush-2) who decided to reverse his father's decision, and let Pakistan buy F-16s. Let's see: We arm the Taliban to fight the Russians, and end up fighting the Taliban later. We arm Pakistan to fight (fill in the blank______) and we'll end up fighting them later.
Not a problem--we just stop selling them spare parts. An F-16 only gets a few hours of flight time before something breaks and has to be replaced.
Considering who paid Bush to OK the sale, I'm sure Pakistan has already bought plenty of spare parts. Do you think these people are stupid?
Maybe we are more interested in the security of Musharaff than Bhutto. Regardless, these are the kind of risks politicians take in radical countries. This kind of thing is not uncommon around the world. Of course I wouldn't expect anything else from you, "It's Bush's fault, It's Bush's fault" has become your mantra even though he has done an outstanding job of keeping your head cut off by those same people who televised Nick Berg's beheading.
LOL
You never saw me say this was Bush's fault. You really need to get to a doctor to discuss these hallucinations of yours.
It IS a valid point.
"witfal" "Wickeddoll"
Agreed - that's why I want to see what Jeff says.
Natalie
Neither of them went on UseNet and ended up owing people half a million bucks.
Who paid Bush to OK the sale? How much did they pay? Did he get a receipt?
I'm not privy to that information. However, you're old enough to learn that any time politicians support a hideous idea, it's for one of two reasons. Either it's in their financial best interests, or they're stupid. Take your pick.
The left kooks have blamed the President for everything else, what make you believe this should be any different?
Still posting the lefty goofy stuff I see LOL
Well, he IS responsible for his own policies, don't you think? Or, is there a hand up his back, making his mouth move?
But you didn't blame it on stupidity---you very specifically accused him of being bribed. If you're not privy to the information then what basis do you have for making the charge?
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.