Timing issue?

My squareback with bog standard 1600 and newish 009 distributor although almost totally reliable over last 13 years has had this idiosyncracy. All my previous VW,s I,ve statically timed at 7.5 BTDC. Doing the same on this old girl causes extremely bad predetonation. What I,ve done to "cure" it is to incrementally retard the ignition till I get no pinging. Runs ok but static timing is at about 5 ATDC. About 1/2 inch to left of TDC mark. What I surmised is that at some distant past somebody has rebuilt engine and not lined up crankshaft/ camshaft gears on assembly so timing marks on belt pulley are out.. Just thought I,d investigate further, very surprised to find TDC on No 1 on firing stroke lines up exactly on TDC timing mark . I,ve got this SVDA distributor I,d like to put in over the 009 but even at 5 BTDC there is major pinging. Is it normal for a 009 to have static timing around

5 BTDC?, To put in my SVDA I,d have to retard it even further to stop pinging. That SVDA is a JFUR4, 311 905 205AA, 0 231 167 016. I,ve got this faint suspicion it may have originally beena dual vac type but not sure. Any suggesstions why timing discrepanc?. Many Thanks John
Reply to
John
Loading thread data ...

SQBK so I will assume you have carburation on it since you are able to run a

009? Running a single or two carbs? Too small for this engine maybe? Vacuum leaks around the intake manifold? What color are the spark plug electrodes when you examine them? Fresh air coming in that is cool and not from around the hot engine?

It could be the compression ratio is too high maybe? Excess carbon in the combustion chamber? Regular gas or high octane? What kind of gas is normal there? ;-) Engine getting a little too hot? Are all of the cooling tin pieces in place especially the ones under the cylinders?

Reply to
dave AKA vwdoc1

Yep, Twin carbies, factory 32PDSIT2. Same carbies as my previous four Type

3,s ( bar the TLE with injection) with no issues so presume thats ok. No vacuum leaks. Spark plugs are powdery black but most of my driving is short runs so chokes on a lot. Because petrol is now unleaded I,m not sure you can use the colour of plugs any more so may not mean much. Not oily though, burns very little oil. ( she marks her spot a bit but one day I,ll put new tube seals in!!!!) No recycling of engine hot air. Engine spotless so no heat build up from the layer of black gunge.Runs on standard fuel, 91-92 rating.All sheet metal bits in place ( I know cos, I,ve taken them all off and resprayed them a nice silver/blue- sad old git arent I!) Muffler off a Kombi. Ta John
Reply to
John

AFAIK With that 009 distributor, did you set the mark on the distributor body at #1 plug wire? Is the ignition system developing a strong enough spark? A weak spark may also cause problems.

I forgot to ask if it pings only on acceleration or it pings while cruising. If only on acceleration then yes it might be the advance but it could also be the accelerator system not supplying enough fuel during that stage. If while cruising then I would think jets are too lean, but I know very little about tuning the carbs for performance. Oil bath air cleaners add a little richness to the mixture but since you are running a stock system then I ASSuME you are using an oil bath system. ;-) I will assume that the fresh air travelling to the air cleaner is not blocked, but I would think that might cause a richer mixture or loss of power.

The carbs might shift if loose creating a vacuum leak. So it might be fine at idle but not when the accelerator cable is pulled, shifting the carb and creating a leak.

Carbon build up inside of the combustion chamber might cause pre-ignition by increasing the compression ratio (decreasing space) and by absorbing the fuel. Some will very slowly add some water into the intake system to help clean out the built up carbon. Others might use chemicals.

I might be totally wrong on this so I am sure someone will correct me! JMHO

Reply to
dave AKA vwdoc1

Only pings on acceleration or load. Going up hill etc. Oil bath cleaner which I,ve soaked mesh in degreaser for an hour or so than washed out. Spotless, also took the bloody paint off!. Carbies tight, all gaskets in. Never heard of the adding water to decarbonise. Anyone know what sort of rates?. She idles smoothly, not too big a flat spot, sits on ~70 mph no problems. About 26 mpg ( automatic)). Cheers John

Reply to
John

Maybe the accelerator system is not functioning rich enough. How is the fuel pressure to the carbs? I would probably study up and adjust the jets to richen up the mixture during acceleration and load (mid-range).

adding water to decarbonise

formatting link

Reply to
dave AKA vwdoc1

formatting link
formatting link

Is there the best way to make this on an stock ACVW carburettor system? Where to connect the water intake? Can one use the vacuum connection in the intake manifold below the carb to connect the water or should the water be inserted above the carb?

What is the desired water volume against time for ACVW engine? Like 1 iter in an hour, less or more?

Reply to
Olli Lammi

I HAVE NEVER TRIED THIS CONSCIOUSLY! lol I have only heard about others doing this during a tune up procedure.

I guess IF I was going to try it I would use a spray bottle and mist the air above the carb while maintaining a fast idle. I am very cautious about not wanted to hydrolock the engine and cause damage!!! I have read a little about water injection to improve gas mileage, improve emissions and keep things cleaner though. I may experiment with a homemade kit, a variety of different size syringe needles and my old Audi. It stays clean though! ;-)

DO THIS AT YOUR OWN RISK!!!!!

Reply to
dave AKA vwdoc1
009's have very spotty quality control. The amount of mechanical advance they deliver, therefore cannot be predicted reliabely. Therefore the "standard" timing procedure for an 009 is not a static adjustment. You should be adjusting them at full advance using a stroboscopic timing light. You set them to between 28 and 32 degrees btdc at over 2000 rpm so the full advance is in. If you then want to go back and note the static timing of that particular unit for future points changes so be it.
Reply to
Gary Tateosian

I,m beginning to think that is probably the answer Gary because nothing else seems reasonable. For a 40 year old engine/automatic that doesnt appear to have been opened up it goes extremely well with very little "expensive noises". By my gradual retarding it I,ve probably got to the ~28 BTDC at max revs which just happens on this one to coincide to about 5 ATDC static. Probably starting a little retarded makes starting a tad easier I would have thought anyway. Being a firm believer in "if it aint broke dont fix it" and it seems happy I think I,ll just leave it. Thanks for advice Gents John

Reply to
John

As easy as it is to swap out...and since you know your 009's likes and dislikes so well, personally, I'd give it a go. The benefits of having a working vacuum advance on mileage and smooth off idle transition make an afternoon of tinkering well worthwhile. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. You can always pop the ol' centrfigal only unit back in in 5 minutes time if you dislike the results. I don't think, however, that will be the case.

Reply to
Gary Tateosian

G,day Bob. Thats basically what I did ( if I understand your point) , took No1 plug out and stuck a dowel down onto piston top and rotated engine so dowel was at TDC on No 1. That coincided exactly with TDC mark in pulley. I think Gary might be right with the 009, just wide manufacturing specs. I suspect the one I put in today was a dual vacuum type that has had a single vacuum unit installed. As far as I know ( sorry old pharts like me dont use AFAIK!) the dual vac retarded the ignition 7.5 deg at start , when idling vacuum,s returned to TDC , then mechanical advanced the rest of way above idle. Putting a single vac advance on that means I have mech and vac advance on a dist designed only for mech advance. Hence pinging. Thats the only thing I can come up with. Might hunt around for another genuine SVDA and see what happens. Cheers John

Reply to
John

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.