Timing Belt Breaking just after warranty expires.

My mother has a 1998 Volvo V70 with 40,000 miles on it. It has a warranty of 5 years or 50,000 miles. It is just over 5 years old and the timing belt broke and they say some valves are damaged. It sounds expensive. Is there anything that can be done besides just paying the bill. Is there any way I can get Volvo to cover all or part of this bill? Thanks

Reply to
Richard
Loading thread data ...

It depend on what kind of service your had on it. In Norway and the rest of Scandinavia Volvo have a service program, with spesific things to check for each service. I suppose that it's the same all around the world. So if your have followed Volvos service program, you should check the service reports. If a Volvo service partner has recently checked or replaced the timing belt, as a part of the service program, you could have a chance to get all or some of the bill covered by Volvo.

If you haven't followed the service program, you probably have no chance to get the bill covered.

Good luck!

- Leiv Magne Faane, Norway '96 Volvo 244 GLE, B230A, 260000 km

Reply to
Leiv Magne Faane

The service program was followed. It said that the belt did not need to be changed till 70,000 miles. So it hadn't been. Unfortunatlely the belt broke after 42,000 miles and a little over 5 years. It seems like the belt is defective to me.

Reply to
Richard

Seems too early to me too. As a data point, I have a 98 V70 T5 that went into service in March 1998 with 105k km on it. I'm planning to do the timing belt next service, which should be soon. The turbo may be a little easier on the belt considering that the valve lift is slightly less than the non turbo. And there's nothing to service in the belt area, so service is a moot point unless it was so bad that a camshaft seized.

Reply to
Mike F

But I think the service program should include checking the timing belt on sertain intervals, exactly to prevent early and fatal failures like this to happen. A timing belt don't often break without having had visual damage for some time.

Another point: If Volvo considers 40000 miles to early to be checking this in their service program, you can claim that this should be considered as a warranty case. Obviously, dealers would think different about this, because they probably want to avoid expenses like that. However, if the dealer want to make sure that you will use them as your Volvo dealer and service partner in the future, they should consider to help you out with this.

Ones again, good luck. Hope you find a good solution.

- Leiv Magne Faane, Norway '86 Volvo 244 GLE, B230A, 260000 km

Reply to
Leiv Magne Faane

If that assessment is in writing, sounds like you have a possible case.

I'm not a lawyer, though - so double-check everything.

Reply to
Joseph Oberlander

Whatever repair the dealer suggests, you/they might suggest paying a proportion of the cost....eg if you got 40000 out of a part which is replaced at 80000, then a 50% contribution might make them accept some responsibility.

Reply to
Conrad Edwards

I think that you will be offered a percentage contribution. If the belt has a "lifetime" or life expectancy of 70K miles, and yours has failed at 42K miles, you may well be offered a contribution of up to 40%, i.e. the balance of the unused life.

If you see what I mean.

Regards

Chris M

C70 T5 GT '99

Reply to
Chris Mulvihill

Paying a percentage of the belt might be reasonable, but I think Volvo should pay for the engine repair.

The cost of the belt is going to be trivial compared to the cost of fixing the internal damage caused by the pistons hitting valves.

Interference engines: Just Say No.

Gary

1972 145
Reply to
Gary Heston

I am sure that Volvo states 70K miles or a amount of time for the belt to be changed you have to look in your owners booklet for time & mileage requirements for the belt change

Reply to
G Klein

A timing belt is only a thin piece of rubber, so change this belt regurlarly, to avoid damages like this. Subaru says when a belt breaks on one of their cars, there is no further damage to the engine. But Ferrari recommands changing these belts every year. Such a belt is not so expensive to delay this repair. Watch all the trouble you have. Don't trust all the advises from a car manufactury. The work to be done by a belt is very heavy, it is allright for a little car with no more valves than necessary, for a small engine. In my opinion a car with a timing belt should be avoided, and otherwise have this kind of belt changed before its time. Although my Volvo 244 from 1977 had no trouble at all, but the belt was changed every 60.00 kilometers. And my Volvo 760 V6 has a chain, no trouble at all. But chains can break too, this causes an expensive and perhaps an impossible repair. Sorry, for these remarks. Gijs van Herpen

Reply to
Gijs van Herpen

A lot of when to change the belt is statistics. Volvo and the belt manufacturer will specify a design, and estimate the number of belt failures at various mileages. The service interval of 80000miles may be adequate for 99.999% of engines, but someone will be the 0.001% who has an early failure.

Reply to
Conrad Edwards

I agree. But, from the owner's standpoint, it also depends on what is at stake, i.e. the potential repair cost, etc.

I don't have too much to worry about it with my 940, with it's B230FT non-interference engine, but with my BMW 3 series M20 power plant, it's a different story. I've heard horror stories... BMW recommends a belt change at 60K miles, but many owners do it at 50K just to be on the safe side.

Bob

Reply to
Aleric

But even then you'd be buggered if the belt broke at 40k....I think in these cases it's best to go to your dealer (if dealer serviced) or Volvo UK and show them the service intervals have been adhered to, and suggest they make a contribution.... How would Sale of Goods Act bear on this if the service life is 80k? Goods have to be fit for purpose...so a belt that breaks at 40k obviously isn't. I wonder if anyone has ever gone to the Small Claims Court?

Reply to
Conrad Edwards

Gary, can you tell us how much this piston problem can cost to repair? We are relative newcomers to volvos and have a '91 740 wagon, purchased with 80,000 mi., checked prior to purchase by our mechanic. Would he probably have checked the timing belt to see the condition? No trouble with it that we know of but we glean that they need changing at regular intervals. Thanks for reading.

Sherry

Reply to
PaNjDeFemale

Depending upon the engine, somewhere between $2000 and $4000.

Repair would involve pulling the engine, replacing all pistons and rods (they're balanced as a set), all the damaged valves, pushrods (if in the engine), as well as all the bearings, gaskets, and such associated with an engine rebuild. Then, of course, the engine has to be reinstalled...

This assumes that the crank and cam shafts aren't damaged. I think that's a remote possibility, though.

Gary

Reply to
Gary Heston

It would involve rebuilding the whole engine, which in my experience is about $2000 plus whatever it costs to remove and install it, something I'd do myself personally.

Reply to
James Sweet

If I'm not mistaken, I believe you have a B230 engine (non-interference) in your 740, in which case a timing belt failure is unlikely to cause significant damage. However, it would be nice if you could find out when the belt was changed so there are no surprises on the road.

Reply to
Aleric

If it's a B230 then yes that's true, I think they mentioned it's a 16v engine though, in which case damage will occur.

Reply to
James Sweet

If you have an interference engine, the timing belt breaking can be deadly. Change it every 40k to 50k. Also, you may want to change the water pump at the first change of the timing belt. THey have to take it off anyway so the incremental cost of the changeover is limited.

snipped-for-privacy@aol.com (PaNjDeFemale) wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@mb-m15.aol.com:

Reply to
kao

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.