'94 Voyager - what is code 32 ????

32 (1984 only) power loss/limited lamp or circuit 32 EGR gases not working (1988) - check vacuum, valve 32 (1990-92, all but Turbo) computer didn't see change in air/'fuel ratio when EGR activated - check valve, vacuum lines, and EGR electrical Do you mean that outside of California, the vehicles do not have EGR valves if they are made in 1994?

I see your confusion. Can you still the sticker on the bottom side of you hood which lists perhaps the layout of your emissions control system? Does it mention any clues?

Generally, how are your vacuum or emission lines and the PCV valve and things like that? I am not a mechanic so I don't know if they segue into code 32. Someone here might know exactly what Code 32 means for the 1994 3.0 Voyager. You can also check your VIN to make sure your engine is not the California variant. I often thought, perhaps erroneously, that Canada had strict regulations which were near what California had. But I could be very wrong about that in this case.

In Canada, generally the emissions requirements are a lot looser than they are anywhere in the US. Most vehicles that are sold here just use standard 49-state US emissions equipment. Some companies (such as Honda in the past) have chosen to release Canadian-specific cars, which have less emissions control equipment. Because the population density is much lower in Canada, we haven't see a bad enough pollution problem to warrant a lot of fuss over emissions equipment on vehicles. Personally, I think it is stupid for the government to wait for a problem to exist before they take action!

Thanks for the codes,

It does give me a hint as to what is wrong. The Haynes manual only mentions that code as being applicable for California models, which have an electronically controlled EGR valve (has an electrical solenoid in it). Looking at my EGR valve, it is completely mechanical (no electronics), operating strictly off of vacuum. The troubleshooting procedure in the Haynes manual suggested checking for opens or shorts in the solenoid - obviously not applicable to my car.

The following code:

Suggests that operation of the EGR valve is monitored by a change in the air-fuel ration (from the O2 sensor, I guess), so that gives me some more to check.

I can manually operate the EGR valve and know that it functions, but perhaps the vacuum line routing has a problem (something failed or disconnected).

Thanks,

Greg

A couple of quick checks.

With Eng at normal operating temp, open the throttle quickly while watching the EGR valve. It should open as the engine starts to pick up revs. It will close as you back off the throttle, or as the engine RPM gets toward the higher range. (There is often a stem that can be observed to see if the valve opens and closes.)

With Eng off. Disconnect vacuum line to EGR from vacuum source. Manually push open the EGR valve. It should open with out being sticky. Release it and it should close by itself under spring pressure. If not, or it feels sticky, replace the EGR valve. You should also notice air drawing into the vacuum hose and them expelling as it closes.

Reopen the EGR valve and Stop the end of the vacuum line with your thumb. The EGR valve must stay open. If it does the EGR valve vacuum diaphragm and EGR vacuum hose are both good. The system seams ok and should operate correctly. If it does not stay open, remove the vacuum hose from the EGR valve itself. Manually open the valve and block the EGR valve vacuum connection. If it now stays open, replace the vacuum hose. If it still does not stay open, replace the EGR valve (the internal diaphragm is leaking).

Also EGR leaks/failures can be caused by a leaking EGR valve gasket under the valve mount. Can only be checked by removing valve, and if you remove the valve, then for sure you need a new gasket anyway. Some Chrysler EGR systems also use an EGR tube to get exhaust gas from the manifold or exhaust, to the EGR valve - if this is present, a cracked, broken or otherwise leaking EGR supply tube can cause EGR system failure and codes.

False. US Federal "49-state" and Canadian emissions requirements have been virtually identical, except for minor labelling requirements, since 1988.

The key being "in the past". This greatly declined in the late 1970s, when GM stopped offering cars with optional non-catalyst exhaust systems, and went away in the mid 1980s, when Volvo stopped selling carbureted(!) 240s, for instance.

False. Overall population density is lower, sure, but population density

*in populated areas* is similar to analogous US areas.

False. Been to Toronto? Vancouver, Calgary? Canada's big cities have major, major air quality problems, of such magnitude that unhealthy air is measured in rural areas far from those cities. Environment Canada has known about this for many years, which is why emission requirements have tightened considerably over the last few decades.

Haynes = trash. Get a *FACTORY* service manual.

Not a completely accurate description of what the code means. It means that the EGR system is seen not to be working -- on some systems it's checked via the O2S, and on some systems it's checked via the crankshaft sensor, and on some systems other methods are used.

DS

This kind of test was valid in the 1970s and '80s when EGR controls were strictly vacuum operated. It is no longer a reliable test now that EGR operation is controlled by the ECM (SBEC, in this case).

Again, this is a '70s-'80s test. Most EGR valves used in the last 2 decades don't have an accessible stem that can be manually pushed open.

The guy's working on a '94 Voyager, not a '74 Duster.

DS

Thanks for the advice Daniel,

How do you suggest I check the crankshaft sensor, if that is the method used on my car?

Regarding pollution problems, yes, I have been to Vancouver and Toronto and currently live in Calgary. I see the pollution problem but I also hear everyone else saying, "this is nothing compared to X" where X is LA or NY or some even larger place. I don't really care about how bad it is there - I just care about how bad it is here and think that more action ought to be taken immediately. I think it is inexcusable that we don't have emissions testing here! It seems like I am always stuck behind a taxi that has 500,000 Km on the engine and is at the point that it consumes as much oil as gas - these guys should be off the road!

I believe that I did state that most Canadian-spec cars are now virtually identical to 49-state cars:

As an aside, I was recently visiting LA and was amazed at how breathable the air was compared to my last visit around 1980. I commend the agressive approach they have taken to vehicle emissions.

Anyhow, this has little to do with fixing my car, "Treeline" had simply asked why a Canadian spec Voyager would have the vacuum based EGR valve and not the fancy electronic one fitted to California models.

Greg

Thanks for the excellent advice Mike!

I will give it a go.

Since the EGR valve is just as you describe - vacuum operated, it should be very helpful to my diagnostics...

Thanks,

With a scan tool.

DS

Amazing.

A guy gives you advice that is totally irrelevant to your vehicle, and suggests outdated tests that were last applicable in the early 1980s, and you thank him for the "excellent" advice, based on...um...

...um...

...what, exactly?

You stated:

All '94 Voyagers have vacuum-operated EGR valves. There is an extra EGR valve position sensor and related equipment on California models.