Aim for $19,200 plus fees on a base LX front-wheel drive. That's around
I drive a two-wheel drive Element, which is mechanically identical to
the CR-V you are considering (except the new CR-V has a five-speed
automatic, not a four). I've frequently had the front wheels slip on me
from a start when it was wet. If I had four-wheel drive, then the car
would send power to the back wheels briefly to give the car traction.
For me, that tiny bit of peace of mind wasn't worth the extra money.
For you, it may be.
Yes. It's a very flexible and torquey motor, and the five-speed
automatic ought to make it even more usable.
Certainly not the decorative stuff. Maybe the roof rack, if you don't
mind a little wind noise.
None, really. The Ford Escape/Mazda Tribute twins are horribly
unreliable. The Toyota RAV4 is a lame duck and will be replaced in the
fall. Hyundai and Kia haven't gotten over their quality issues. The
Chevy Equinox has a V6 built in China. The CR-V isn't just the best
choice, it's the ONLY one.
I agree and just bot an '05 SE with AWD. I live in the STEEP hills of
Pittsburgh and can tell you the 4 cylinder is VERY peppy even going up the
By the way, I originally went to buy a RAV and also looked at the
Escape/Mariner/Tribute. By accident I stumbled into a Honda dealership. I
had originally ruled out the CR-V as I didn't like the looks of the base
model or the LX. But the Special Edition looks VERY good. Anyway, I found
out exactly what was posted here....dollar for dollar there is NO other
vehicle with the same quality, economy, size and safety as the CR-V. (The
Escape vehicles don't have stability control...another negative for them not
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.