Did I say he owned any oil companies? In your Bush-worshipping imagination, you don't think W has ever forgotten who he serves best, that being his friends in Big Oil? And not just his American friends in Big Oil...
You have a wierd speedo then. On the assumption that the 200 miles and the time is correct, when you are doing 66.7mph it reads 70mph ( +5% fair enough) but when you are doing 63mph it reads 55mph (-13%).
I realize my advancing age sometimes clouds my memory..... but just who instigated the First Gulf War?
Didn't a coalition including most of the middle eastern neighboring countries fight against a despotic dictator who threatened the entire region and had already proven the ability and willingness to use chemical weapons as well as other WMDs?
Didn't this same despot terrorize another middle eastern country, who was not in the coalition or threaten it in any way, and then attack it with missiles he claimed might be carrying WMDs killing innocent men, women, and children?
And where do you get this information from? Your arse? As far as I know, they targeted the Trade Center because of it's international symbolism. It had much more impact than running a 747 into the Sears Tower.
This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from one's arse, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember, they did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of another kind of bureaucracy.
It's not about Muslims vs. non-Muslims. It's all about business. I am not making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes, Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
It's not about Muslims vs. non-Muslims. It's all about business. I am not making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes, Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
It's too bad, that it is "our government's military might" rather than "ours". :o)
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.