Well Tim, they certainly don't make them like the used to. put my '73 164 volvo against my S3 head to head, i dont reckon there would be a great deal of difference. both built like brick shithouses and both way almost exactly the same.
Sam.
Well Tim, they certainly don't make them like the used to. put my '73 164 volvo against my S3 head to head, i dont reckon there would be a great deal of difference. both built like brick shithouses and both way almost exactly the same.
Sam.
Aye, and to be honest I wouldn't want to crash in either. Weight counts for a lot, but the way a car absorbs energy is the important thing, not how it looks after the crash.
If I was going to have an accident with my 2 year old in the back? I'd take my Volvo over FiL's Mazda every time, not to mention over most Land Rovers ever made.
I'm still getting a lot of stick. To add insult to injury my father-in-law is, as the third party, getting a courtesy car whilst they touch up his bumper. I'm off the road for 9 days with only the offer of a special price on a hire car. Hurrrumph...
Landies are more fun though, I hit a rock with the side step, bent up the side step something rotten, but did not impede my progress in any way :)
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.