Applying for licence after ban

So if your driving was of such a good standard, why did you get stopped?

You are a sanctimonious bastard Finnigan. I have admitted I was in the wrong. No I wasnt fit enough to drive. I made a mistake and ave paid the price

Neil Baker

That doesn't quite square with "I didnt hurt anyone nor was I anywhere near that".

If you admit you weren't fit enough to drive, how do you reckon you were not close to hurting someone?

No, you will have paid the price in another year.

I`d rather be accused of being a "sanctimonious bastard" then being a scumbag f****it with no regard for the value of human life, and lack the intelligence to realise when something is wrong.

You made the same mistake TWICE so far - in evolutionary terms that means you`re not the fittest and therefore don`t deserve the right to breed - th last thing anyone needs is more idiots like you in the gene pool. Nor have you paid the price yet - what was the punishment you where given for this offence? What punishment have you so far completed? If the two answers aren`t the same then you haven`t paid your price have you?

You state that you "wasnt fit enough to drive". Can you please explain how being unfit to drive can possibly be consistent with your statement that "was I anywhere near that" when discussing hurting people?

As a serious question, why do you feel you have the right to use the roads while driving a motor vehicle, when you`ve already been found to be drink driving TWICE? There is no excuse for once, never mind twice. As it is you`ve got off very lightly, imagine spending the rest of your life knowing that due to your stupidity you killed (actually lets be honest, murdered) someone by running them over while drunk. Or perhaps their family would have hunted you down and given you what they (and indeed many other people I`m sure would agree) consider to be a more fitting punishment?

Basically say whatever you want, you`re the f****it who can`t understand that driving while pissed is the behaviour of someone who quite simply doesn`t deserve the rights to oxygen, never mind anything more wooly like the ability to drive a motor vehicle.

OK Finnigan I can see why you hate me. Honestly I know I was wrong and will NEVER do it again. I aint no f****it and I can imagine what it would be like if I had hurt someone. I have learnt my lesson

Neil Baker

Did you say that after the *first* time as well?

I have a lot of friend who have to clean up the mess that scum like you leaves behind them drunk driving, so yes I do hate you. Not dislike, not disapprove but genuinely HATE you, and all other idiots like yourself who feel that your "right" to get drunk and then drive hom is more important than someone else right to a safe journey home, or their right not to have to scrape a young child from the bonnet of a car (with the associated psychological damage thus caused).

Did you claim to have learnt your lesson after the first time you did this? Will you claim the same after any further "relapses"?

Exactly like you said the first time I expect.

Yet you drove drunk.

Apparently you didn't. Once is enough for everyone except the serial drink driver.

( snipped-for-privacy@hotmail.co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :

No, Neil, you have NOT. You have another YEAR to go, but are trying to get out of paying that part of the price.

( snipped-for-privacy@hotmail.co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :

Bet you said that last time.

Right...

Conor ( snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :

The vast majority of us don't even need the once.

There was a time when drink driving was quite normal. The worse place I saw for it was in the USA.

I know a guy that was waiting to go to court for the second time and got caught a third time for drunk driving. It was 20 years ago and he did not receive a gaol sentence, he was wealthy enough to afford a chauffeur.

Simon Finnigan pretended :

It is surprising the amount of people that drive after smoking dope, that has to be as bad as drunk driving surely ?

on 04/06/2007, Dave Plowman (News) supposed :

They can check what is known as the liver gamma enzymes.

Normal is 49 or under which mine is now. In the past mine has been 550 which is far too high.

Most blokes who like a drink are about 100-170 which is considered too high. It is not possible to fool anyone with this test.

"Baldoni XXV @googlemail.com>" Simon Finnigan pretended :

Quite possibly. Since I`ve never tried the stuff I`m in no position to judge the difference :-)

"Baldoni XXV @googlemail.com>" It happens that Simon Finnigan formulated :

There was a time when sex with young boys was perfectly normal as well, which means saying it was OK in the past isn`t the best of arguements to make for any position :-)

The message from "Simon Finnigan" contains these words:

Hush, or it's back up the chimney with you.

We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember "Simon Finnigan" saying something like:

I'd like to point out that the OP, to the best of my recollection, was busted for being twice the limit - a limit which was reduced by half from the previous limit some 15 odd years ago. For years, the old limit was deemed acceptable and I've yet to see much in the way of any evidence that someone who has a blood alcohol count of the old limit is actually unfit to drive.

But still, never let facts stand in the way of a good rant.