RAMFM Then and Now- a call to arms

Nov 13, 2003 9 Replies

Greetings all, Way back in 1995 when I helped start up the rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang news group, it was meant to be a place where like minded people could come and discuss Mustangs. New mustangs, old mustangs, and everything in between. It was meant to be a place of open discussion of anything Mustang. Free from editing, deleting, and manipulating, unbiased in it's purest form. A place clean of commercial advertising. What it was not meant to be was as a database or web content for a privately run web site to use in order to boost their own post count for reasons not known to anyone else but themselves (ego perhaps). As of right now, the RAMFM's content is being manipulated by a privately run web site and it's "admin", it's content copied without the permission of each user and placed in to a "web forum" theme in such a way as to make it look like it was all done on that particular web site, by it's members, where in fact, it is not. This is appalling to me, I can think of no lower a way to promote a business, or a web site, than to steal (yes steal) the content of of this news group and use it for their own. I have sent out an email to the owner on record of this web site, and supposedly, he will be getting back to me in the next few days. I humbly suggest that anyone else who finds this type of theft disgusting write a tasteful email to Christian Rishel at snipped-for-privacy@comcast.net (or call him at 2play corp.com (which owns Etech hosting as well) and explain how you feel about this invasion and usage of our content. I am most certain that Christian would not like his new company to make "cyber news" in a negative way, as that will most certainly effect the growth, or lack of growth his company will see in the future. The more emails (or phone calls) he receives, the better chance we will have of getting their " admin" to remove this newsgroups content from their privately run web site. Once again, I thank the real members of the rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang news group for your cooperation in this matter.


Sincerely,



Bill S. Coordinator on record for the RAMFM since 1995



Just popped off an email to him a moment ago.

Scott W. '66 HCS?

The subtle renaming of RAMFM. What is he trying to pull. Maybe if he gave full credit to the group, then maybe it wouldn't be so offensive.

The fact that he is using (again, the words are theft of content) this newsgroups content to boost the "thread" and "post" count of his private web site is what is truly disturbing. (Wonder how they would feel if someone copied everything from their web site and posted it at another).......That and the fact that people are posting here, with the full intention of having it stay here, and not there. Funny that this post showed up there (I just printed it out along with all of the others that include anything from myself, as they do not have my express permission to use any content that I post, nor the content of this news group for private use), wonder how long it will take "the admin" to edit or delete it, as he has done with anything else that does not shine a positive light on his web site.

Bill S.

Scott Van Nest wrote:

I haven't been to Admin's web site and I have no plans to go there. I've been reading this newsgroup for years, and I don't give a rat's ass who does what with its content, as long as it remains intact here in the original forum, i.e. USENET.

Political agendas like this (and I gather Admin's, also) suck. My 2 cents. Don't like it? Flip the channel.

Joe Calypso Green '93 5.0 LX AOD hatch with a few goodies Black '03 Dakota 5.9 R/T CC

"Bill S." wrote in news:6RSsb.14034$p% snipped-for-privacy@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:

Hey Joe,

I appreciate your candor..As such, you have the right to determine which sites you post on, just like which news groups you post on. In this case, the web site and it's "admin" is taking away that choice of whether or not to participate on his web site with his current actions. His actionjs are misleading those who visit his site in to thinking that there is more to it than there really is........It's truly a cruel double edged sword either way you look at it............

Bill S.

Joe wrote:

Bill,

You know I respect you, but I simply disagree with what's going on here. I personally don't care who does what with whatever I post. That's why I post anonymously (and to avoid spam, too).

I post everything to unmoderated USENET will full realization that it's not mine once I hit the 'send' button. Anyone who posts to a public forum thinking that they have some kind of control or ownership of their posts is naive IMO.

Out of curiosity, I took a look at the web site, and you're right - it's blatant fraud. Morally, it's scum. But from a purely legal standpoint, why can't he do what he's doing?

Joe Calypso Green '93 5.0 LX AOD hatch with a few goodies Black '03 Dakota 5.9 R/T CC

"Bill S." wrote in news:LAXsb.419$ snipped-for-privacy@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:

What would they say of someone took all of their content and posted it elsewhere in the first person. With the shoe on the other foot, don't you think they would be adamant about the theft of their intellectual materials.. It's my choice to post or not to post here and elsewhere. I do not belong to their web site, and I chose not join and not to post to it of my own free will. When they take my posts here, and use them there, they are taking away my right to choose..Something I do not take lightly.....Again, it is a nasty double edged sword.................

Bill S.

Joe wrote:

"Bill S." wrote in news:axYsb.916$ snipped-for-privacy@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:

They'd probably get pissed and whine and bitch. But the whole point is that once you post to unmoderated USENET, it's not yours. It's everybody's.

Sure, but why post intellectual matierials to unmoderated USENET if you don't want them taken, cut up, twisted, and whatever else? Caveat emptor.

As is everyone's.

No they're not. Part of that choice to post as mentioned above includes the knowledge that your posts are not yours once they hit the public servers.

When we post to a public forum, we forfeit ownership rights of what we post. Knowing that, what right do we have to complain that someone takes those posts and does whatever with them?

What this all boils down to is this: Do you believe that your posts are still yours after you post to public, unmoderated USENET? I don't think so.

Joe Calypso Green '93 5.0 LX AOD hatch with a few goodies Black '03 Dakota 5.9 R/T CC

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required