Re: Rightards are smart on beating people up the wrong way... Scaring Tactic is the name of their game

"Canuck57 Sucks" wrote a piece of shit news:Tv54o.50383$ snipped-for-privacy@newsfe11.iad...

> Socialism and marxism is about bringing everyone down to the lowest common > denominator, poverty add taxation servitude. See Cuba and Venzuela for > some examples. But isn't go>> Goodbye to those $40/hour UAW car production line jobs tightening >> bolts and taking breaks every two hours! >> >> But does McDonald's have 15 million U.S. jobs for our erstwhile middle >> class dumb'uns? >> >> Even Barack's brilliant administration can't put factories back >> together again! >> >> ------------------------ >> "The job machine grinds to a halt" >> >> >> Op-Ed >> By Harold Meyerson >> Wednesday, July 28, 2010; A15 >> >> >> >> >> >> AIN'T NO HIRING. And ain't likely to be any for a good long time. >> >> The problem isn't merely the greatest downturn since the Great >> Depression. It's also that big business has found a way to make big >> money without restoring the jobs it cut the past two years, or >> increasing its investments or even its sales, at least domestically. >> >> In the mildly halcyon days before the 2008 crash, the one economic >> outlier was wages. Profit, revenue and GDP all increased; only >> ordinary Americans' incomes lagged behind. Today, wages are still >> down, employment remains low and sales revenue isn't up much, either. >> But profits are the outlier. They're positively soaring. >> >> Among the 175 companies in the Standard& Poor's 500-stock index that >> have released their second-quarter reports, the New York Times >> reported Sunday, revenue rose by a tidy 6.9 percent, but profits >> soared by a stunning 42.3 percent. Profits, that is, are increasing >> seven times faster than revenue. The mind, as it should, boggles. >> >> How can America's corporations so defy gravity? Ever adaptive, they >> have evolved a business model that enables them to make money even >> while the strapped American consumer has cut back on purchasing. For >> one thing, they are increasingly selling and producing overseas. >> General Motors is going like gangbusters in China, where it now sells >> more cars than it does in the United States. In China, GM employs >> 32,000 assembly-line workers; that's just 20,000 fewer than the number >> of such workers it has in the States. And those American workers >> aren't making what they used to; new hires get $14 an hour, roughly >> half of what veterans pull down. >> >> The GM model typifies that of post-crash American business: massive >> layoffs, productivity increases, wage reductions (due in part to the >> weakness of unions), and reduced sales at home; increased hiring and >> booming sales abroad. Another part of that model is cash retention. A >> Federal Reserve report last month estimated that American corporations >> are sitting on a record $1.8 trillion in cash reserves. As a share of >> corporate assets, that's the highest level since 1964. >> >> Why invest in new plants, offices and workers, particularly here at >> home? Spooked by the 2008 crash, corporations want to keep more money >> under the mattress. More important, they're sitting pretty as profits >> rise. >> >> Is this model sustainable? It's hard to say -- a double-dip recession >> could plunge their profits yet again. But from the American worker's >> perspective, the model, no less than a new downturn, is an unqualified >> disaster. It portends the kind of long-term, structural unemployment >> that we haven't seen since the 1930s. It locks into place a generation >> of reduced incomes. >> >> This dystopian America already stares us in the face. Fully 46 percent >> of the unemployed have been without work for six months or more -- the >> highest level since the Bureau of Labor Statistics began measuring >> such things in 1947. Two years ago, just 18 percent of the unemployed >> were jobless for more than six months. America's private-sector job >> machine -- the marvel of the world since 1940 -- has clanged to a >> halt, and there's no place for it in corporations' new business model. >> >> The restoration of American prosperity, then, isn't likely to be >> driven by our corporate sector. Across-the-board business tax cuts >> make no sense when business is already sitting on oceans of cash. >> Targeted tax cuts and credits for strategic investment and hiring >> within the United States, on the other hand, make excellent sense. The >> Obama administration has proposed expanding the tax credit for the >> manufacture of green technology here at home, and congressional >> Democrats will soon unveil legislation creating further incentives for >> domestic manufacturing. >> >> Another source of jobs would be public, and public-private, investment >> in infrastructure. As Michael Lind and Sherle Schwenninger of the New >> America Foundation have argued, building a new American infrastructure >> of roads, rail and broadband is not only an economic necessity but >> also the investment with the highest multiplier effect in creating new >> jobs. A U.S. infrastructure investment bank, such as that proposed by >> Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), could leverage significant private >> capital to begin America's rebuilding, though the idea has encountered >> rough sledding in (surprise) the Senate. >> >> What won't work as an economic solution -- indeed, it amounts to cruel >> and unusual punishment -- is blaming the unemployed for their failure >> to find jobs. There are now roughly five unemployed Americans for >> every open job, according to the Economic Policy Institute's most >> recent calculations, and that ratio isn't likely to decline much if we >> leave it to the corporate sector to resume hiring. Corporations have >> figured out a way to make money without resuming hiring. Their model >> is premised on not resuming hiring. If the public sector doesn't fill >> the gap, the era of American prosperity is history. >> >> [ snipped-for-privacy@washpost.com] >> >>

formatting link
--

> Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common > sense?

Socialist or not, I love it, why? Because it's good to punish the cheating Republican from robbing our moneys through Scamming investment, Scamming Short of Power, Scamming Stock market etc..

Reply to
Edmond H. Wollmann
Loading thread data ...

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.