I'm still enjoying the dead silence from the Clinton supporters here.
I'm still enjoying the dead silence from the Clinton supporters here.
Which Clinton supporters are you referring to?
No names. They've made themselves plain enough without my finger-pointing. At least three; 'nuff said.
He's right. Whether Bush was right or wrong to go war, Congress should never not have left the power to go to War to the President.
Jeff
They endorsed McCain and Clinton for the primary.
Being pro-McCain doesn't mean holding back stories about him. Unfortunately, regardless of whom they endorsed or were for, they used really bad judgment.
Jeff
Judgment? You're very naive if you don't think it was orchestrated from the start.
While it is certainly possible, I am not going to ASSUME this either way.
That's "ASSume". Get it right, buddy.
No, it ASSUME, as in make an ASS out of U and ME. You can emphasize what you want, I will emphasize what I want.
Jeff
Hey ! My idea, my spelling.
Unless you wanna pay royalties.
Could be he's started to look like a Republican? ;)
WHAT?!?!?! The popular media lie? Say it isn't so!!!
BTW, did you know no Secrtary of State has ever gone on to be President? (Yeah, I didn't, but it turns out it's WRONG!)
Who said no S of S had ever been president? Did you say that, or was it Strickland?
The Times cannot but help salivate at the thought of a Dem president. The hit piece on McCain, and the expose on Billy's uranium deal only point at what candidate they really want.
But of course!
Short memory...remember the other thread where someone listed the SoS' that had become President, and you said that I was making it up?
Or do you have a clone?
I shudder to think of where I heard it, but it may have even been a guest on Glenn Beck's TV show. I honestly can't remember.
Only witfal deserves any continuity of thought. You: I'll always need reminders, since you make no sense most of the time.
I asked my father about this, and he didn't think China received anything imporatnt from Loral or Hughes. Sadly, Google's search results were overwhelmingly for political articles, not technical articles that could have shed light on this matter.
Loral received permission from Clinton (a donation recipient) to share technology with the Chinese which enabled more accurate targeting of their ICBMs.
I make plenty of sense to people that can read and know when someone's being sardonic...
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required