On the other hand, Romney *is* well known for switching songs a bit too
> often, depending on his audience. Multiple choice Mitt...
I don't know a person in my life who has not changed stances or changed up their stance on a political issue. Mitt's "flip flops" are not remotely any more than anyone else. That commercialized drive has been going on since John Kerry ran, and it's rather ridiculous...
Mind you, a representitive should be open to changing stances.
Not three times in one week.
Did he do that? When?W here? and What issue?
Reproductive issues, back in September if I recall correctly.
I remember that and he was explaining his change in the 90's because his Mormon Faith had changed some stances on the issue of abortion.
This involved 3 absolutely contrasting statements to different audiences in the period of a week. Somewhere in my 2.3 million web bookmarks, I have a link. Maybe I can find it.
Changing position on an issue based on changing conditions or new information is acceptable. Changing positions to fit the sentiments of a particular audience is not.
Jack G.
id like to see it
Google might help you in the meanwhile. Try the words "multiple choice Mitt".
Remember a couple of weeks ago when McCain looked square at Romney and smilingly told him to the effect "I would certainly agree that YOU"RE the candidate of Change" meaning that he changed his opinion on issues every time you looked around.
He did not look Romney squarely in the eye. He said it with a smirk while looking around.
That's OK. He was sharing the joke with everyone else, who'd already noticed what Romney is.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required