They're still all DAMN heavy. New cars are too gadgety, why are rain sensitive windows needed? Whats wrong with flicking the stalk up yourself? Leccy windows in the back, you're nice enough to give someone a lift, surely they can wind down their own window?! :)
Just because its a rev-monster of an engine doesnt mean its strained! Its a fanrastically designed engine. And it doesnt need a turbo to hike up the power like all volvos do!
The E30 318is is supposed to be a brilliant thrashmeister, too, with half sensible economy when you're not revving the arse off it.
In fact had I thought before, I'd have recommended one of these to SteveH before he'd gone and saddled himself with yet another eytie special - if anything those are holding their, if not gaining in, value these days, not depreciating, they're respected and revered that much.
Not in the economy and ease of creating a vast swarthe of load space stakes though... and the Zafira will remain quite firm in value for long after most
806s have bitten the dust. (!)
I don't want an MPV really, but given family requirements and forthcoming work requirements, one of those seems to make more sense than having a van and a car when you take into account the cost of insuring and taxing two motors etc.
Anyway, then Berlingo Multispace HDi is the current favourite, if I can find one cheap enough.
The original comment was not what would be most fun but that Volvos were boring. Comparing like to like (and 3 series was the comparison) I am convinced they are not. A 106 Rallye is not a comparable vehicle to the S60 / 3 series argument.
Taking it to extremes, I reckon a Ferrari 360 would be great over that route.
Nah, i think i'd have more fun in the 106 cos i'd dare push it harder :) It wouldn't matter as much if i stacked it (assuming speeds were low and i'd suffer no permanent injury). Whereas even if i was loaded i'd be pissed if i binned my ferrari, they're all individually numbered and stuff aren't they?
Just because it's got a turbo doesn't mean it's badly designed or needs it, there's plenty of non-turbo 5 cyl volvos around. Turbo gives us the mid- range wallop that those M cars don't have (qualifying note to that statement - the current M3 is a beast of a motor, but thing how nice it would be with a turbocharger...)
That's the first of the 16 valve BMWs isn't it? I remember them feeling mega quick (was the first beemer I drove, was used to Ladas / Rovers before that) and making a great noise. Bit tail light though. But yes, great engine for its time.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.