Would you with someone elses?

Sep 06, 2008 23 Replies

I don't get it, Pete: it is not the fuel that goes in which is interesting but the power it makes.

Fuel economy also creeps into the picture when a tanc of fuel is empty after half an hour of madness unless sitting on 200 l (= 200 UKP) of easily burning petrol is an option.

Let's throw a big rock in the pool... what's best: a 700 Hp Ultima using american beast doing 3MPG or a 400 Hp V8 TDI audi-Ultima, thundering - hunning is a better word-at 3800 RPM and 270 kph for hours?

Nope: it wasn't an Ultima nor a Porsche who did Brussels Muninch (880 km) in 4 Hr 12 min without refuelling... if I needed to do that with a (slightly tuned) 928 I would need the RAF for refuelling when on the go and still it would be a hell of a close call.

Petrol engines are only usefull when weight comes into the equation: Lotus Seven/ Elise-style but once you have a car weighing above 1500 kg, the engine is diesel, my friend.

Second rock: if your turbo-rangie sported 300 HP and a (turbo)-diesel engine you would be swarmed by potential buyers. It being a petrol engine, makes it a bit less interesting, doesn't it? Even Arabs, drilling their own oil, aren't interested,as they have the money to buy new toys.

Tom De Moor

That would be very tasty if it were a 320. I also like the fact that the last clocks I saw like that were fitted to a lorry...

I don't want to drive for 5 hours without getting out to stretch my legs occasionally.

Let me put it this way, if my Rangie was a turbo-diesel, I wouldn't have even considered buying it. No way. To get more buyers, it needs LPG, not some stinking, rattling, unrefined, narrow torque banded lump of derv burning crap under the bonnet.

That is what draws me to them.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required