40 mpg Prius vs 50 mpg European Diesel cars

It wasn't always so. Time was that Mercedes charged a premium for the gas engines. If I remember correctly (always a chancy thing), the -D was, for some years, the bargain basement Mercedes and a gasoline engine was $3K upgrade (might have brought along more features).

I can't think of any particular reason why a diesel should be significantly more expensive than a gas engine - at least not any intrinsic reason. Doesn't it have a similar part-count and similar fabrication methods? Those two items should pretty much determine the cost to produce, shouldn't they? Fixed costs divided by unit production make a difference. If the diesels are low-volume production, the fixed-cost per unit would be higher but I doubt this would justify a huge price difference in the motors. Other supply chain overhead might also drive up the cost of the lower-volume engine a bit.

*** Posted via a free Usenet account from
formatting link
***
Reply to
DH
Loading thread data ...

I think that the lower volume of diesel engines for many automotive applications is what drives up the cost, plus the additional battery capacity. The mechanical fuel injectors used to be very expensive, modern electronic ones are probably in line with the cost of a gas engine.

Reply to
Ray O

Could be because the diesel engine is in fact dirtier than the gasoline models you mention? For example, you cannot buy a new VW TDI diesel in my state, because the emissions are so bad.

2006 VW Golf TDI, EPA air pollution score of 1, LEV. Not sold in CA or the New England states.
formatting link
2006 VW New Beetle TDI, EPA air pollution score of 1, BIN9. Not sold in CA or the New England states.
formatting link
2006 Toyota Highlander Hybrid, EPA air pollution score of 8, BIN3, not sold in CA or the New England states, or for the CA emission version is an air pollution score of 9, SULEV II.
formatting link
2006 Toyota Highlander Hybrid, EPA air pollution score of 8, BIN3, not sold in CA or the New England states, or for the CA emission version is an air pollution score of 9.5, SULEV II.
formatting link
(fueleconomy.gov doesn't have the 2007 model years available yet, otherwise I would've included the available 2007 Toyota Camry hybrid. no score was listed for the VW Jetta TDI.)

(EPA air pollution scores are based on 1=worst, 10=best. For the Maximum allowed grams per mile Emission limits at full useful life (100,000-120,000 miles), see:

formatting link
) To note the limits for the non-CA emission states (listed as maximum grams per mile):

NOx=Oxides of Nitrogen: Compounds containing nitrogen and oxygen; they combine with hydrocarbons in the sunlight to form smog

1 = 0.6 8 = 0.03

NMOG=Non-Methane Organic Compounds: Compounds containing carbon; they combine with NOx in the sunlight to form smog

1 = 0.280 8 = 0.055

CO=Carbon Monoxide: A colorless, odorless, poisonous gas

1 = 6.4 8 = 2.1

PM=Particulate Matter: Tiny particles of solid matter that lodge in the lungs and deposit on buildings

1 = 0.08 8 = 0.01

HCHO=Formaldehyde: A lung irritant and carcinogen

1 = 0.027 8 = 0.011

So yes, I would say that the diesels are dirtier (more than 2x for HCHO, 20x for NOx) than the Toyota hybrids, because they are.

Reply to
mrv

Dodge Sprinter is selling in every states.

UPS/Fedex Spr =>

=>Could be because the diesel engine is in fact dirtier than the gasoline =>models you mention? For example, you cannot buy a new VW TDI diesel in =>my state, because the emissions are so bad. =>

=>2006 VW Golf TDI, EPA air pollution score of 1, LEV. Not sold in CA or =>the New England states. =>

formatting link
formatting link

=>2006 VW New Beetle TDI, EPA air pollution score of 1, BIN9. Not sold =>in CA or the New England states. =>

formatting link
formatting link

=>2006 Toyota Highlander Hybrid, EPA air pollution score of 8, BIN3, not =>sold in CA or the New England states, or for the CA emission version is =>an air pollution score of 9, SULEV II. =>

formatting link
formatting link

=>2006 Toyota Highlander Hybrid, EPA air pollution score of 8, BIN3, not =>sold in CA or the New England states, or for the CA emission version is =>an air pollution score of 9.5, SULEV II. =>

formatting link

=>(fueleconomy.gov doesn't have the 2007 model years available yet, =>otherwise I would've included the available 2007 Toyota Camry hybrid. =>no score was listed for the VW Jetta TDI.) =>

=>(EPA air pollution scores are based on 1=worst, 10=best. For the =>Maximum allowed grams per mile Emission limits at full useful life =>(100,000-120,000 miles), see: =>

formatting link
)=>

=>To note the limits for the non-CA emission states (listed as maximum =>grams per mile): =>

=>NOx=Oxides of Nitrogen: Compounds containing nitrogen and oxygen; they =>combine with hydrocarbons in the sunlight to form smog =>1 = 0.6 =>8 = 0.03 =>

=>NMOG=Non-Methane Organic Compounds: Compounds containing carbon; they =>combine with NOx in the sunlight to form smog =>1 = 0.280 =>8 = 0.055 =>

=>CO=Carbon Monoxide: A colorless, odorless, poisonous gas =>1 = 6.4 =>8 = 2.1 =>

=>PM=Particulate Matter: Tiny particles of solid matter that lodge in the =>lungs and deposit on buildings =>1 = 0.08 =>8 = 0.01 =>

=>HCHO=Formaldehyde: A lung irritant and carcinogen =>1 = 0.027 =>8 = 0.011 =>

=>

=>So yes, I would say that the diesels are dirtier (more than 2x for =>HCHO, 20x for NOx) than the Toyota hybrids, because they are.

Reply to
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

"I can't think of any particular reason why a diesel should be significantly more expensive than a gas engine - at least not any intrinsic reason."

The high compression ratios are the main reason. Everything is hunkier and heavier built, from the pistons to the connecting rods and the crankshaft, bearings and crankcase, and the fuel metering system and injectors must also accommodate high pressures and temperatures and vibration. Bearings and rings tend to be more sophisticated in their design, requiring more machining and additional parts, and the lubrication system is more sophisticated, with even the old VW Rabbit having piston-cooling oil showers. More noise-deadening padding and baffling must be employed. And since the ignition is by compression rather than spark, the engines are less amenable to electronic control, reducing the beneficial impact of one of the biggest savings drivers in automotive design today. Emissions are more difficult to clean up, too. Despite what you've read on this thread, modern European automotive diesels are plenty stinky, though I admit they are improved.

Reply to
Scott

I wonder what your neighbours would think of you burning old fish & chip oil.

Reply to
mailman

I think you are wrong. Both diesel and petrol engines are built to the same tolerances and, though engine management for diesels is even more sophisticated than petrol, the impact on cost is negligible.

The only convincing reason I know of for diesel engines being more expensive is that a much smaller number of them are made. Thus the development costs must be recovered from a smaller throughput.

The things you mention might call for a few extra grams of steel - chickenfeed.

If a diesel system is produced in similar numbers to petrol you will find little difference in cost per engine.

And I have a theory that diesel engines last longer - because their fuel has some lubricating properties, unlike petrol.

Thus a mass-produced diesel might well yield a whole of life cost less than the petrol equivalent.

Reply to
Ken

The Dodge Sprinter has a GVWR of 8550lbs.

formatting link
Therefore, it is exempt from fuel economy testing (passenger vehicles over 8500 lbs are excluded) as it is considered a heavy truck, and probably doesn't have to meet emission requirements either. Same goes for other popular vehicles like the Ford F-250/350 series and Excursion, Hummer H1 and H2, Dodge Ram 2500/3500 series, Chevy Suburban

3/4 ton, etc.
formatting link
I'll also note that OSHA has various regulations on diesel exhaust, but I haven't seen the quite so many for gasoline (mainly just for auto repair shops or drive-through restaurants).
formatting link
Reply to
mrv

Every time he drives by, they start thinking about lunch.

*** Posted via a free Usenet account from
formatting link
***
Reply to
DH

Burning 500 million barrels of it a day would certainly stink the place up.

Reply to
Bill

You could be right about the cost but I'd think that the Diesel 'would' be heavier. I think you're wrong about the lubricating properties though, gasoline does have lube properties, perhaps not as much as Diesel fuel though...hell, even water has lubricating properties...

Reply to
Gord Beaman

Mmm... onion rings and fish!

Mike

Reply to
Michael Pardee

"I think you are wrong. Both diesel and petrol engines are built to the same tolerances and, though engine management for diesels is even more sophisticated than petrol, the impact on cost is negligible."

Horse... well, feathers.

Why "think" when you can "know"? Google is your friend. Here, let's look at example parts costs:

===

formatting link
Mahle Piston Set - .50mm Volkswagen Jetta GLI Piston Set: List price, $311.03, "our price" $259.19

Mahle Piston Set - .50mm Turbo Volkswagen Jetta Diesel Piston Set: List price, $504.68, "our price" $420.56

===

formatting link
Volkswagen Golf III GL 4 Cyl Cylinder Head Gasket, Reinz: Your Price $21.43

Volkswagen Jetta Diesel Cylinder Head Gasket, Reinz: Your Price $29.92

===

These are typical, and reflect significant design, construction, material and, yes, tolerance differences (especially in the fuel injection system, where pressures can exceed 2000 psi even in indirect-injection configurations). If you'd ever seen even an economy automotive diesel engine stripped down, you'd have an appreciation for this. And, worldwide, diesel engines are very popular; your conjecture about relative volumes is incorrect, though certainly they hold in the U.S.

If you'd look instead of "thinking", you'd find nuggets such as "The cylinder head for the [VW] turbo diesel uses a different gasket [vs. the gas model] and is cast from a special stronger alloy. Different materials are also used for the turbo diesel cylinder head's valves, valve seats, and combustion pre-chambers."

formatting link
and "Although theforged-steel connecting rods are similar to those used in thespark-ignition engines, the pistons are of far more robust dimensionsand are totally different in design, since they must be capable ofattaining very high compression pressures and withstanding the loads ofcompression ignition. As on other Volkswagen engines, full-floatingpiston pins are secured by circlips. The connecting rods for the turbodiesel engine have greater piston pin clearances, however, and thepiston skirts are notched for clearance with the piston-cooling oiljets."
formatting link
and "Dieselengines and high performance gasoline engines feature an oil coolerattached to the filter housing through which engine coolant circulatesto help moderate oil temperature."
formatting link
You are correct, however, regarding the lubricity of diesel fuel and the whole-life lower cost of diesel engines, at least mechanically (although as I've noted from my experience, the rest of the car can be just as crappy and have just as short a life as a gasoline model!). Much depends, of course, on the relative costs of fuel. That varies, even in a given location. In the '70s diesel fuel was usually considerably cheaper than gasoline in the U.S. Today it generally isn't. In Europe today, the relative prices of the two fuels depends mostly on regional tax policies, since taxes are a much larger component of fuel costs there than in the U.S. (where they're still very high compared to, say, oil company profits per gallon).

And you neglect the fact that in conventional (non-hybrid) installations, diesel engines need all the stuff a Prius doesn't: alternator, power steering pump, belts and followers, clutch or torque converter, transmission, shifter and linkage, and so on-- all of which needs maintenance, the occasional repair, and periodic replacement of significant components. By comparison, the hybrids need their little planetary-gear power-split gizmo, two electric motors, and a battery.

Reply to
Scott

The following link sheds considerable light on relative cost of production of petrol and diesel. The striking thing is that, for an given type of crude (and, I suppose, any given refinery) there is an optimum ratio of the volume of output between the two fuels. Changing this affects costs directly and, also, indirectly by increasing pollutant problems which have to be addressed at increased cost.

formatting link

Reply to
Ken

Is it really an either/or proposition? I always had the impression that petrol and diesel fuel came from different fractions in the catalytic cracking process. Is that not the case?

Geoff

Reply to
Geoff Miller

You win this point - that is the case if you talk about the natural raw products in the simple stages of refining.

Now if they want to spend a bunch of energy cracking the heavier hydrocarbons that would make diesel into lighter ones for gasoline, or the opposite by combining the light ones to get more diesel out of that barrel of crude, they can. But while it adjusts their output, it also adds a bit of cost.

-->--

Reply to
Bruce L. Bergman

There was much discussion in this thread about a diesel hybrid

It turns out that GM of all people is way ahead in devloping hybrid diesel - in buses. the following links tell the story - diesel, hybrid, regenerative braking - the lot! 60% gain in economy.

formatting link

formatting link

formatting link

I owe it to an Australian electronics magazine - Silicon Chip - which is running an article in its June issue on this GM - Allison project which is not pie in the sky - the vehicles are operating in various parts of the US.

Reply to
Ken

Except you wouldnt do that for the sake of your engine would you, poor thing accelerating hard when cold!

Agreed, modern common rails are amazing little creations. Mind you I manage to average 45 from a carb'd petrol engined small car that is 17 years old so you'd have hoped they could have got a little more out by now :)

J
Reply to
Coyoteboy

When cold the Prius engine speed doesn't change noticeably on even fairly strong acceleration, like we do going up the hill from our house - that is done by the electrics. The engine continues to do its warm-up process at about 1200-1500 rpm. Of course, you wouldn't want to take any present day car right onto the freeway when cold, that would stress the engine. In a serial hybrid (not available in production today) it wouldn't matter at all.

Mike

Reply to
Michael Pardee

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.