{OT} fair -->joke<--

There was a young college girl that was about to finish her senior year of college. She considered herself to be a very liberal Democrat and was always at odds with her conservative Republican father.

One day she was challenging her father on his beliefs and his opposition to a large benevolent government, and tax equalization, etc. He stopped her and asked her how she was doing in school. She answered that she had a 4.0 GPA but it was really tough. She had to study all the time, never had time to go out and party and often went sleepless because all of the studying. She didn't have time for a boyfriend and didn't really have many college friends because of all her studying.

He then asked how her friend Mary, that was attending the same college, was doing.

She replied that she was barely getting by. She had a 2.0 GPA, never studied, was very popular on campus and was at parties all the time. She often wouldn't show up for classes because she was hung over. He then asked his daughter why she didn't go to the Dean's office and ask why she couldn't take 1.0 off her 4.0 and give it to her friend that only had a 2.0. That way they would both have a 3.0 GPA.

She fired back and said, "That wouldn't be fair, I worked really hard for mine and Mary has done nothing!"

After a moment of silence, she replied, "Dad, quit trying to change the subject."

Reply to
badgolferman
Loading thread data ...

Your point is well made. We should let infants of poor ignorant single mothers and fathers die of starvation and illness because it would not be fair to take my hard earned money to provide formula and medicine to that infant who's parents did not apply themselves as hard as I did. Heck, I must be a conservative now, thanks.

Richard.

Reply to
Richard

If I'm driving around with a bag of deposit bottles in my trunk and see someone fishing thru garbage for the same I give them what I have. I guess I'm a conservative too. mark_

Reply to
mark digital

Sounds good. Where can one find a FISCAL conservative Republican now a days?

Social conservatives seem to be a dime a dozen now a days. Want to limit abortions? No problem. Want to keep gays from marrying? No problem. Want to keep gays from adopting? No problem. Want to promote "intelligent design"? No problem. Want to cut taxes? No problem.

Fiscal conservatives seem a bit harder to find...

Want the goverment to waste less money on programs that help very few people so the dollar remains relatively strong and our grandchildren don't have to pay off the loans? Find me a few electable politicans. PLEASE!

I'm a fiscal conservative and a social liberal. I don't get along with "big government conservatives". At least liberals usually do something that benefits me with all that money they take from me...

Reply to
someone

How can this be? A social liberal wants government to fiscally fund liberal ideals.

Reply to
badgolferman

No, that's a _socialist_.

A fiscally conservative socially liberal person is more like a practical libertarian. I'm all for small government, but I think we need some basic services like military, police, laws, courts, short term welfare, job training, etc.

The current "conservatives" go against just about everything I believe in the role government should play. They are all about big government entitlements and big government spending, but they erode environmental protections and poke their noses into personal issues.

If someone wants to get married to their same sex partner and adopt and support an unwanted child why should the goverment care? From the government's perspective, isn't that better than state sponsored foster care?

Why isn't the abortion issue only a family & doctor issue? Why should the government be involved at all?

If someone is terminally ill, why should the goverment criminalize their doctor or spouse for helping them kill themselves?

If a husband wants to pull his wife who has been comatose for years off a feeding tube and the courts allow him, why should Congress intervene?

If someone wants to do recreational drugs in their own home and they are not out driving on the highway while high, why should the government care?

If a coal burning power plant has the techonology to greatly reduce mercury pollution available at a financial cost far less than the social costs of the damage the additional mercury is doing, why shouldn't the government mandate reduced mercury levels?

Reply to
someone

For the same reason one can not marry their parents, siblings or their dog I guess. It is against the very laws of nature

I guess for the same reason the government gets involved if one kills the mother or the doctor

Who knows for sure if the spouse and the doctor are lovers? How would allowing that square with those 'terminally ill' people that have survive on occasion?

The same reason, after a jury of one peers says a killer should be put death, the government intervenes? Besides who speaks for the comatose spouce?

What if a firefighter get killed at the house fire they start while stoned?

For the same reason that the government gave utilities a pollution deference in the first place. Higher utility rates will piss of the voters, like when the government passed a law that a car could not be started if everybody did not wear a seat belt, back in the seventies. Beside who decides the cost? ;)

Reply to
Mike Hunter

and some of them have been on medicine so long they couldn't face a beautiful paradise without going off the deep end. Very sad. mark_

Reply to
mark digital

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.