LOL, good old al.
- posted
16 years ago
OT This is a hoot!!
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Fortunately, nothing changes, ever, so conditions in 1992 were 100% identical to every year thereafter, forever.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
but but I thought saddam didn't harbor terrorists or didn't have WMD.....
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Fortunately, nothing changes, ever, so conditions in 1992 were 100% identical to every year thereafter, forever.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Saddam failed to honour the terms of the cease-fire. Hence the intervention of the Coalition forces. What part of THAT do the LIEbrawl DEMONrats not understand?
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
In other words you'd rather not comment. Don't blame ya, LOL.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Fortunately, nothing changes, ever, so conditions in 1992 were 100% identical to every year thereafter, forever.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Fortunately, nothing changes, ever, so conditions in 1992 were 100% identical to every year thereafter, forever.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
That does it for his run for the prez.....LOL
What a dope.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
He did make some good points about saddam however, good thing GWB took him (saddam) out, LOL.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Yup.
How in hell could they award him the Peace Prize with talk like this?
ROFL