Re: Tire question

May 31, 2009 Last reply: 17 years ago 9 Replies



> > Hi gang! Well, time to rotate tires and change oil again. My '06 Camry's
> >
> > manual calls for simple front-to-rear tire rotation, keeping the tires on
> >
> > the * same side * of the car. However, my tires are not uni-directional > >
> > tires (there is no arrow displayed on the sidewall), so I was wondering if
> >
> > it would be okay on the Camry LE to rotate its tires front to rear and > >
> > criss-cross the rear tires to the front, so eventually every tire will do
> >
> > service at each of the 4 axles? This would seem to me to provide the most
> >
> > even wear on each of the 4 tires. Anything wrong with my plan? And why > >
> > would the manual instruct owners to rotate tires as if the tires were > >
> > uni-directional, even though the tires are not unidirectional? The > >
> > manual's method keeps tires on the same side of the vehicle forever. > >
> > Thanks very much in advance :-)
>
> Your plan is OK, however, consider who is more likely to know more about
> your car - the people who post here or the people who designed and made your
> car :-)
> --
>
> Ray O
> (correct punctuation to reply)
>

I had the same question on my Avalon with Michelin tires. I emailed Michelin. They said to (for front wheel drive car) move the front tires straight back and to cross the rear tires to the opposite side front. They also suggested a 6000-8000 mile rotation interval unless you see uneven wear.


Tim K



Sorry Jeff, your information is out of date.

Tim K

I also have an Avalon. Michelins, even with rotation, lasted less than 30K. These tires dont have a long treadlife.

I just replaced them with Kumho Platinums, assymetric, with 60K treadlife. So far, they are great.

Let me be a little more specific. These PARTICULAR Michelins dont seem to have a long treadlife.

I have had several sets of Michelins of other types, on other cars, and have gotten ca 70K out of them. I am in general a strong supporter of Michelin.

I had looked into buying a Porsche but was put off by the expensive tires which had to be changed very frequently ( 15-20K miles or so). They were that way to give the ride that many Porsche owners wanted. Same for Avalon, I think.

####Your old Camry didnt come with this type of tire. (and it IS a fairly expensive tire...I believe they were $185 each to replace) It is VERY possible to buy Michelins that will give you 70-80k for some applications.

####The tires were properly inflated, and were rotated. They wore very evenly and had great traction. I couldnt believe it either, but found them on Tire Rack and other users who reviewed tdhem seem to have similar results.

It would be very possible with this one, but - no - I dont smoke the tires.

That's right. The Michelin Primacy at Costco is about $125 w/ installation. And these have a 600 tread rating (approx 60K miles) with a 60K mile warranty. And if people are saying the cheap Bridgestones last only 15-20K miles then owners shouldn't pay more than $35-50 having a Bridgestone installed (otherwise these cheap tires would cost too much).

Tire Rack shows my originals should have been Michelin Energy MVX4s. UTQC is 440. They are now $177 each, plus shipping, mounting, etc.

Neither of my new Toyotas came with Bridgestones. They BOTH came with Michelins.

You made a blanket statement, although the grammar in the sentence is a little lacking.

"Toyota uses Bridgestone tires because it is a Japanese company" is an independent clause. If you had said "Toyota (often or sometimes )uses Bridgestone tires because it is a Japanese company" your foot wouldn't have gone in your mouth.

Both my cars came with Michelins, and Bridgestone is irrelevant to this thought thread.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required