Realistically the only difference I can see it making is it becomes legal > to use 8 plys, which IME last longer, but then I probably move more weight > than a taxi.
It looks like a Grey area to me, the Meter is governed by the tyres and
*Taxi* tyres are 6 ply not 8 ply. That does not have to affect the rolling radius but it could do?. The company that I supply ( Which is not based in London) still insist on tyres that are marked Taxi. But thanks for the heads up on that as I had not seen it.
So, to which degree to you stop buying better and better then Adrian? It's arse-talk to pretend you've got amazing tyres on all your vehicles, because you don't. You've probably got mid-range. What if having even better tyres on your car if you hit someone, as you suggested who has walked off a kerb, could have stopped you sooner and prevented hitting them?
It's all relative. REALLY s**te tyres are just that, really s**te, normal 'acceptable' budget tyres are a fair compromise, especially to people who plan ahead appropriately when driving.
On this prima facie evidence alone, *all* the on-car tyre tests are useless in gauging how a specific tyre would fare on *your* car! It would be interesting to test, by swapping the two sets of Kumho, whether there is absolutely no material difference.
David R (david snipped-for-privacy@ntlworld.com) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :
I'm glad you've checked all the fleet".
Exactly one of my fleet doesn't have Michelins fitted all round. It's got Firestones, and they're not a patch on Michs size-to-size, which is why it's gone up a size.
The Firestones are getting towards the end of their life, and will be being replaced by Michelins.
The point of the experiment is to have the same tyre on different cars, not different tyres on the same car.
If my pound coin does not disengage the coin lock on the first supermarket trolley, but does so without problem on the second, I would conclude that the first trolley is faulty. In 'Stuffed's case where the tyre on the first car performed badly and on the second car well, I would conclude that the first *car* was faulty. The coin is basically sound. The Kumho tyres were also basically sound, sticking to the road "like velcro to a sheep" (assuming both sets of Kumho were identical, i.e. the one(s) on the Rover were not out of specs.)
'Stuffed' has drawn an illogical conclusion from his tyre experience.
Yet Colway do a cracking motorsport tyre and HGVs do billions of km per year on remoulds. AFAIK, some aircraft also use them although I'm not certain on that.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.