I take it all back...

If the basic architecture had had anywhere near what the PC has had thrown at it in terms of time and development, it actually would be, tbh.

;-)

Well, yes, but that's where Macs come in.

Yes, but it's also one that as I pointed out elsewhere, is quite unique in hot hatch sibling terms.

True, true. Personally, i'd have the 1.9 - cos its faster :) And with a Turbo added is even better ;)

And rear drums look crap.

So does your mum, but me and your dog still rate her as a better hot hatch.

Douglas

-h +sn

HTH.

You can't see them when the car is on OEM alloys.

hatcsn?

You're weird.

Douglas

Clearly any self respecting owner would have added the 15" wheels from a 1.9 (don't think the 1.6 came with these?), which have big enough holes in for you to see them :)

I rate your dad even higher.

Why would you do that?

That era of hot hatches was designed around 14" wheels with 185/60 tyres.

There really isn't that much between the standard 1.6 and 1.9, performance wise... you just have to drive them slightly differently. :-)

A properly done MI-16 conversion, is the way forward, my child.

He also says you are shit.

Douglas

Well yea....

But the 1.9 came with 15" wheels with 195's, and as that was the far superior version, they're obviously better :)

You need to look beyond the engine size and see the purity of the 1.6 as a hot hatch.

Nah, Atari ST beats the socks of 'em all, followed by the Amstrad PCW.

Peter

I'll see your PCW and raise you a Dragon 32.

I happen to have ten original games sitting here for one of those.

Ahem, anyway: