Re: Temporary speed camera taxes £1m in 18 months

Motoring campaign groups have attacked a "revenue-raising" temporary

>speed camera which has brought in over £1m in fines during the past 18 >months. > >The Gatso camera at roadworks on the M62 at Ferrybridge raised >£1,088,000 from 18,000 drivers. > >The Highways Agency said it used cameras where necessary for safety. > >But Edmund King, Executive Director of the RAC Foundation, said he >doubted safety was the main aim of the camera. > >He said: "The camera's objective should have been to slow people down. > >"It is obvious it was not doing its job by the number of motorists >speeding. > >"It raises the issue of whether this is more about revenue-raising than >safety." > >
formatting link

Went though the average speed cameras near J8 on M1 last Thursday. I think a lot of people down there need to get in touch with learning direct and have reading lessons. Seemed to think they can do 70mph between the cameras and then slow down at the camera.

Went though the same set up at Leicester near junctions 20/21 quite a few times and just about every person had got the hang of it straight off.

-- Peter Hill Spamtrap reply domain as per NNTP-Posting-Host in header Can of worms - what every fisherman wants. Can of worms - what every PC owner gets!

Reply to
Peter Hill
Loading thread data ...

arround the M60 North yeasterday. 40 limit through roadworks. No works there, but limit in place and camera signs. At 40 we were the slowest on the motorway, by a long way. Stupid people.

Reply to
NeedforSwede2

It's interesting how many lorries pass you when you drive at a GPS 40 through roadworks. Especially since we are constantly told how responsible good drivers they are.

Reply to
Depresion

Its amazing how many cars you pass driving at spot on 50 on the speedo in a lorry.

Reply to
Conor

Lorry tachographs have to be calibrated. Your GPS just has to be "close enough". Anyway, if we get caught, we've always the tacho disc as a defence.

Reply to
Conor

The GPS, by design, will on average, over a minute or so, be pretty much dead on. It's computing the speed from difference in position over time, and if it's got the distances right, then it can't on average get the speed wrong.

For steady speeds, it's going to be pretty much right.

Reply to
Ian Stirling

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.