{OT} shrinking glaciers

Aug 22, 2006 83 Replies
Jump to replies (83)

More proof that Al Gore is full of hot air. I think he's causing global warming everytime he opens his mouth.



--------------------------------------------


formatting link
Greenland's glaciers have been shrinking for 100 years: study Aug 21 3:18 PM US/Eastern


Greenland's glaciers have been shrinking for the past century, according to a Danish study, suggesting that the ice melt is not a recent phenomenon caused by global warming. Danish researchers from Aarhus University studied glaciers on Disko island, in western Greenland in the Atlantic, from the end of the 19th century until the present day.



"This study, which covers 247 of 350 glaciers on Disko, is the most comprehensive ever conducted on the movements of Greenland's glaciers," glaciologist Jacob Clement Yde, who carried out the study with Niels Tvis Knudsen, told AFP.



Using maps from the 19th century and current satellite observations, the scientists were able to conclude that "70 percent of the glaciers have been shrinking regularly since the end of the 1880s at a rate of around eight meters per year," Yde said.



"We studied 95 percent of the area covered by glaciers in Disko and everything indicates that our results are also valid for the glaciers along the coasts of the rest of Greenland," he said.



The biggest reduction was observed between 1964 and 1985.



"A three-to-four degree increase of the temperature on Greenland from



1920 to 1930, and the increase recorded since 1995 has sped up the ice melt," he said.

The effect of the rising temperatures in the 1920s and 1930s was "visible dozens of years later, and that of the 1990s will be (visible) in 10 or 20 years," Yde said, adding that he expected Greenland's glaciers to melt even faster in the future.



The shrinking of the glaciers since the 19th century is "the result of the atmosphere's natural warming, following volcanic eruptions for example and greenhouse gases, created by human activities, which have aggravated the situation further," he said.



The study also showed new results on galloping glaciers, the name given to glaciers that surge very quickly for a few years, up to 50 meters a day, before advancing more slowly at a rate of 20 meters per year," he said.



"We have identified, thanks to new analyses of aerials photographs and satellite images, almost four times more galloping glaciers, or 75 compared to just 20 in previous estimates," he said.



The two authors of the study were to present their results on Monday at a conference in Cambridge, England on the impact of global warming on glaciers.



He and my boy Howie Dean are fun to watch...

Maybe you should read the quote you posted..... if you have the ability to do so.

Brings to mind the Columbia glacier in the Canadian Rockies. We were up there and walked on it in the late fifties. Some years later, in the late seventies I motorcycled the same route and I was surprised to see how far it had receded.

It says that human activities have aggravated the situation.

by how much?

It says the glacier shrinking is a result of natural warming (Sun), volcanic eruptions (Earth), and some aggravation by human activities. Aggravation is not the result, it is a small factor.

You mean to say that ice melts from the heat of the sun? It is indeed a revolution. Has anyone told big al bore?

Anyone familiar with glaciology would read this statement with some considerable interest. Surging (galloping) glaciers aren't that difficult to identify. That the number of surging glaciers in an area may have quadrupled is pretty indicative of a substantial change in the local climate.

NASA studies of Greenland ice sheets show an acceleration in the rate of mass loss. ACCELERATION Get it? Apparently, not.

Aggravation could just as easily be a large factor. There's nothing in that sentence that says it's large or small.

Nevertheless, it seems pretty easy to conclude that it says that human activities have aggravated the situation.

We're screwing up the planet and we should do something about it.

Dodging the issue again?

Read my lips: "It says that human activities have aggravated the situation."

We've made things worse and we should be working to fix that.

LOL....would you quit picking on my main man Bore?

Well since you libs like killing babies...

Is it time for you to start killing the rest of us?

We really should reduce the population. How do you suggest we start doing that?

Well, then what can be done about it? Or do we sit and continue to use it as a political tool.

But why should we humans not do anything to curb the negative impact that

*we* are making on the environment? We can have control over that part of the deal.

Tangentially to your appelation of Al Gore: I have never figured out why a person's bland (or bland_ish_, IMO) demeanor should affect his/her credibility.

Cathy

Al bore said we got global warming, he had a movie you know, so it must be true if al said it....right?

Ok, let's assume you and your followers are right. What to do about it? Got any ideas? Make a few suggestions.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required