(OT) What do you think?

formatting link

Basically, Palin thinks that if she runs then she would win going toe to toe against Obama.

I think that at this point, I could win against Obama. But, I'm not sure that just because Obama would be relatively easy to beat in the current climate that me or Palin would be the best thing for America.

Palin's candidacy would be driven more by the emotional attraction she has than the intellectual abilities. That's problematic for me. I hope America sees that the support of Palin is emotion-driven -- basically, the little head is making the choices.

Perhaps Palin can up the intellectual qualities that she brings to the table before the election. That would help alot, but I have serious reservations that it will happen.

Reply to
Jeff Strickland
Loading thread data ...

formatting link

I think a lot is riding on Bristol and if she wins on Dancing with the Stars, if Bristol wins than her mom ought to be a shoe in for president. "Man shoots TV over Bristol Palin's 'Dancing'? success"

formatting link

Reply to
FatterDumber& Happier Moe

formatting link
>

formatting link

I hate to pull a JoeShitForBrains, but I just couldn't let that one slide.

And, what's up on DWTS? I watched the last 10 minutes of the show last night, and Brandy was very hot -- she pulled a perfect score -- but still got sent home. I missed Bristol's performance, but it would have to be very very good to be better than Brandy's (Brandi ???).

But, one should not pin the hopes of a candidate on the actions of a child. That works both ways in my book. And if one is going to pin the hopes of the candidate on the child, the child just has to avoid going to jail...

Reply to
Jeff Strickland

formatting link

If Obama were a white man he never would have been elected due to lack of qualifications outside of being black in America. That said, Americans will never vote a woman in, so the majority will go for the warm and fuzzy, feelings they get by electing a black guy. That vote at least gives Americans bragging rights around the world.

Econo-cars

Reply to
Econo-cars

formatting link
>

I don't think you are correct on the woman for president. I believe a woman could be president, Ferraro was the wrong woman -- well, she was tied to Mondale, who was also the wrong man.

Palin is another matter. I don't think she should be president, but there is a very high _emotional_ attraction to her that could get her to the Oval Office.

I think that Palin is as qualified, or more qualified, as Obama. But that speaks more to Obama's lack of qualifications than to Palin's wealth of them.

Reply to
Jeff Strickland

The other way around -- if the media had spent half as much time looking into Obama as they did looking into Palin, Obama would be on the streets today.

formatting link
>>

Reply to
Jeff Strickland

Way to go, top posting fool. Argue for the other side.

Reply to
Gary L. Burnore

Actually, they spent more. You two just ignored it. You also ignored the fact that Palin is a quitter. (You guys like that though, right?)

Reply to
Gary L. Burnore

Hackkkaroo and Mikkke both know why they don't like Obama but they just don't have the balls to outright admit it.

Reply to
Gary L. Burnore

Actually, no. I'm pretty clear on why Palin would be a bad choice for Prez.

There wasn't much discussion of Obama's socialist upbringing in the national media. Except for the whackjobs at Fox, not many people talked about the ties Obama has to Bill Ayers. George Soros and his buddies over at the Tides Foundation are utterly ignored while they pour millions into the far left Democrat candidates.

But Bristol Palin is presented by the media as Trig's mother while she is carrying a baby of her own, and it all they talk about for weeks.

Reply to
Jeff Strickland

It wouldn't have mattered how much the media or anyone else looked into Obama's past or heritage. Millions upon millions of minorities who had never even registered before got off their big fat asses and voted for the first time ever. Not because they knew squat about politics, only because they wanted to put it to the whites for once. It was the first time voters who determined the win, not qualifications or merit.

America will never vote in a woman no matter which woman. They may consider a black woman like Congolisa Rice or Oprah I've been through everything you have and more Winfrey, but that's about it.

Econo-cars

Reply to
Econo-cars

Nobody was going to expose the results of investigations on Obama, the questionable actions of relatives in Kenya, his over zealous want to Muslim relations no matter the cost, or his friendships with blacks who have publicly made racist statements again not only white populations but also other non-black populations. The reason nobody brought these up during elections was because they knew if they tried the truth would get immediately attacked (and buried in the process) as being racism. LOL. What a loop we live in.

Econo-cars

Reply to
Econo-cars

"Jeff Strickland"

I think your arguments are good, but it will take a long while to convince me that Americans will vote in a woman, any woman. Maybe Oprah I've been everywhere you've been plus more Winfrey stands a chance based on world image, but that's about it for the female population. Any other woman will be torn to shreds before the debates even near.

Obama is a joke, but by electing a black millions of previously uninterested Americans suddenly became registered and voted. That has historical value, but will also contribute to the building of America from that election onwards. Just think of how many of those will actually get enlightened to the importance of voting, and hopefully the importance of knowing the issues and proposed solutions. Better than having them back sitting on their asses happily residing in little bubbles with no regard for anyone outside that dwelling.

Econo-cars

Reply to
Econo-cars

Gary L. Burnore you sound like another loser who tries to bury the truth by implying racism to devert attention away from the actual facts. Sucks to your cries of racism, Obama is a loser, he'd be an even bigger loser if he were white because if he were white he never would have been elected with such a lack of qualifications. His biggest qualification was the warm and fuzzy feelings everyone got by voting for him. I wonder if people are heating the bubbles they dwell in from those warm and fuzzy feelings.

Econo-cars

Reply to
Econo-cars

Biden has plenty of legislative experience, he's just a dumby. He says dumber stuff than W ever said.

Every President we've ever had has had zero experience as head of the Executive Branch.

Reply to
Jeff Strickland

"Jeff Strickland"

LOL. Ignore Gary Burnore, he's too busy projecting his own hatred to realize the rational thoughts being discussed.

Econo-cars

Reply to
Econo-cars

Oprah, arguably, has greater emotional attraction than Palin, but I have to wonder if she has the intellectual superiority. That's saying alot if one wonders if Palin is intellectually superior to Oprah. I think Oprah would be a worse choice for Prez than Palin, but Palin would be a spectacularly poor choice. She could turn into a good choice, but pigs might fly someday.

Reply to
Jeff Strickland

We live in fear of being labeled racist if we wonder aloud at the past of Obama, but there's no stigma of being called sexist if the woman that's unfairly under attack is white. And wealty.

Reply to
Jeff Strickland

Claiming I hate blacks? Really? That's pretty funny.

Reply to
Gary L. Burnore

Truth is, Obama needs to grow some balls to stand up against the republican blocks.

The real truth is the republicans will still block.

Actually, he won, dumbass. It'd be McSame who'd be the loser. Until

2012 at least.

Now your racist remark:

Other than being an incredible run-on from an illiterate twit, it's completely false and only based on race. "If he wasn't black" = RACIST. (you)

Reply to
Gary L. Burnore

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.