they should make a convertible one!
formatting link
really like this
Jan 31, 2009
11 Replies
formatting link
>
Would that require an SVA if it was a UK job?
I thought that would be considered a radically altered monocoque?
Elder gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying:
Nothing says "Second-rate third-world dictator wannabe" better. Then there's the Lambo doors. FFS.
Just because it was registered, mot'd modified and sold doesn't mean there is no possibility of it needing an SVA.
It isn't just kit cars and imports that need SVA tests.
And it will get worse with the IVA.
formatting link
That is utterly hideous.
Even if the roof fitted when up, and it stowed neatly when down I still wouldn't touch it in a million years.
I think you should buy it.
formatting link
ok on second look the roof doesn't look the neatest job, i mean the middle bar looks a bit odd like they just angle grinded the old pillars off. still i think potentially it would look good as a convertible
formatting link
That's just s*it.
hth
formatting link
>
LOL i love this place
formatting link
>
I'm not a fan of that. I think most of the appeal of the 300C is in the shape of the whole thing, cutting the roof off just makes it look s*it.
Almost as s*it as this..
formatting link
formatting link
Looks hideous, every time I see a 300C I think of this
formatting link
, it's like a Ford Mondeo trying to look like a Bentley.
formatting link
I'm not a fan of that. I think most of the appeal of the 300C is in the > shape of the whole thing, cutting the roof off just makes it look s*it.>
Hell, that's *spectacularly* s*it. "No strengthening was done"?? I bet it bends like an overripe banana..
formatting link
LMAO that's well good!
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required