An inconvenient Truth (OT)

Jun 25, 2006 208 Replies

Pat,

It IS political; just not necessarily partisan. Politics is nothing more than the process of using persuasion to to influence other people into working with you to achieve some end. Politics is not necessarily evil in and of itself.

I happen to believe that "climate change" is being used as a political tool by people who want us to act in a manner that's contrary to our own best interest. Hence the tactic of trying to scare us into doing this or that.

YMMV

Gord Richmond

Y'all are a hoot. The consensus seems to be:

1) If Al Gore is involved, there can be no value in it.

2) Global warming is bullshit because I can find some people who say it is.

3) Even if global warming is not bullshit, humans can't have any effect on climate. I know this is true because I can find some people who say so.

4) I might go see this film if you can prove to me that everything in it is true before I see it.

5) You cannot prove anything to me because my mind is made up.

6) None of it can be true because the government doesn't say it's true.

7) None of it can be true because some people in the government say that it is true.

Damn - talk about an appropriate title for a movie.

Back to sleep everyone - whatever you do, don't allow any pesky thoughts to contradict that which you already know to be true. That would be truly inconvenient.

BTW - this whole thread went exactly as I thought it would - though I must admit to feeling just a little bit smug about being right on another count. That link to an ignorant rant about redeploying the troops was left pretty much alone, as it reflected the 'politically correct' POV here. Jeff, you can be so predictable - I knew your outrage would be pretty much used up on this thread, no comment needed for the right wing liberal bashing.

I'm climbing off, thanks to all for playing!

Gord>> There is no disagreement that the earth is warmer then it has been

You are welcome. Thank you for trolling Lake Studebaker.

Lee

Just what I need is someone else advising me how to be moral......

Which Jeff? (I can only speak for me) My predictability is that I hate OT post's that have political intonations, even if they hide behind a theatrical pretense. If that makes me predictable.. Superb! At least you know I'll be honest about it and call a spade a spade. And why do you give a rats ass about a consensus? You tossed this out and drew the responses you wanted. I'd be happy with that. Jeff

"Pat Drnec" wrotet...

Please, I'm trying to quit. The data is only been shown to be reliable back 400 years, they "think" 2000 years, but aren't sure. Before that, it's impossible to track with so little written history.

Gord>>There is no disagreement that the earth is warmer then it has been

Pat, a modified paraphrase from the wizard of Oz. "Toto, I've a Feeling We're Not in California Anymore. All you've done is proved some folks have a different mind set then you do and you seem surprised. Al Gore is a polarizing figure, no matter the accuracy the movie. Would you watch a movie narrated by Rush that took the other position on the issue if invited, or would you like most folks want to see something that you agree with ? Hell, GW was asked today if he would see the movie after being encouraged to do so by a group of top scientists and he said no, nor would anyone from the EPA admit they had. They should have had James Earl Jones moderate the damn thing.

Pat Drnec wrote:

Jeff Rice wrote: Just what I need is someone else advising me how to be a moron......

"Mertz Rac> Just what I need is someone else advising me how to be moral...... >

No s*it. Funny thing is, I would absolutely see the hypothetical Rush movie - I like to form my own opinions, as do you - after all, you seem to visit the Fox site more than occasionally....

John Poulos wrote:

Do you have any idea what causes the El Nino events?

mike hunt

Just think in only 5 billion years we will all be toast. ;)

mike hunt

Perhaps in your opinion. Try spinning a ball at high speed and observe the air movement. What I said was, if it were not for hurricanes we could not live on earth.

mike hunt

That is true for surface wind, but if the earth did not spin the air would stratify in the same area, not move to the colder polls. The same is true of ocean temperature the warmer water moves toward the polls and pushes the colder water toward the equator. You can prove it to yourself with a bit of research. Hint; The temperature gets colder the higher one travels up in the atmosphere.

mike hunt

formatting link
>>>>>>>>

formatting link
>>>>>>>

However there IS a difference of opinion as to the CAUSE, if it is in fact getting warmer. There are those that believe the activities of man can effect the earths climate. There are just as many climatologists and scientists that believe the earths temperature is the result of combinations of several natural phenomena all of which are beyond the control of man and have a far grater effect than anything man can do. Sun spots, the relationship of the earth to the sun as it rotates in it elliptical orbit around the sun, variations in the earths axis, movement of tectonic plates that changes the temperature of the oceans, and volcanic activities. Who was it that made the earth this warm the 400 years ago you reference? Who was it that made the average earth temperature a fantastic four digress higher for the 165 million years the dinosaurs roamed the earth? Who was it that caused the ice age 13,000 years ago, the covered most of the northern hemisphere, but not the southern hemisphere and why? ;)

mike hunt

"Pat Drnec" wrote in message news:Uz1og.123651$ snipped-for-privacy@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...

if the earth did not spin, we would be semi equal to mercury..

800 on one side, and -200 on the other.. --Shiva--

They then must have the same 'ends' as did the Democrats. The Kyoto treaty was written up during Clintons time. He did you even present it to the Democrat controlled Senate for confirmation, knowing it was not good for the country.

mike hunt

During the time of the dinosaurs it was four degrees warmer. Mammals also lived at the time and it was the mammals that survived the temperature drop. There are those who believe that, unlike the dinosaurs, manuals survived because they have a diaphragm. There was far more plant growth then because of the warmer more humid weather and therefore a higher percentage of oxygen in the air, as much as 30% or more. As the oxygen level dropped the large animals, without a diaphragm, had trouble breathing and died out. ;)

mike hunt

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required