The mix of the two components would *not* be heavier than the individual components weights summed. __ Steve .
The mix of the two components would *not* be heavier than the individual components weights summed. __ Steve .
Of course I'm right... Freon is not a mixture. __ Steve .
Post of the Month! Understatement of the Year! __ Steve .
Keep stringing it along... 'air conditioning' doesn't have 'refrigeration' as part of it? Would you never find a HeadMaster(tm) on an air conditioner?
Put in a straight piece of pipe... remember? And just don't let the ambient get too low! Probably need to remove refrigerant as well. A three-port device would need a plug for the bypass route.
There's a little drool on your goofy grin... watch it.
Nice crawfish move! Indeed you backed away...
You're still stuck with it... used a brand name after complaining of same. Pot-Kettle-Black. Especially since nobody here used 'Freon' as an arcane way to hide information that they were flaunting. =20
Well, can't you do the same as that 'room full'? Go ahead, take it apart! We'll start with 'high side'... was that wrong?
You don't believe me! You actually think I=20 cheated! Anyone else here think I cheated? __ Steve .
The *king* of the non-sequitur! Just answer the questions... and your assertion that Democrats have not served in the Armed Forces is patently absurd... you need a brain scan. Remember the Chickenhawks! Have *they* been in the Armed Forces? No! Neither have I. __ Steve .
"The volume change created by mixing is their new density"
One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may be reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, and state why.
L.W.(ßill) Hughes III wrote:
OK, I see your point. What I should have said was "the sum of the two
The mix of the two components would *not* be heavier than the individual components weights summed. __ Steve .
TRANSLATION --> "ill do it again"
the concentration isnt enough to cause a problem.
stop making s*it up.
yeah no s*it....its what ive told you from the beginning.
no.
lol.....this is a classic example of the differences in a liberal and a conservative! you ask me a question about your industry which i know nothing about. i tell you up front that i do not, nor do i care to know, anything at all about your industry. i ask you a question about my industry where you are so pitifully ignorant that its funny at this point, and instead of just admitting your limitations you do a google and then attempt to dazzle us with bullshit. when that fails you continue to try to spin away from what is painfully obvious.....you know jack s*it about refrigeration and your source knows about as much. :-)
lol horseshit. you did a translation which i find quite flattering that you would attempt to duplicate me. :-)
LIAR! i complained about his definition of the brand name. i never defined my statement in any way. liar. :-)
Hey, if you can put your head completely in the sand, I can propose reasonable thought-experiments!
Tell us again how the entire world is wrong! __ Steve .
Mix the three and see what you get... poisonous goo. Combine them properly, and you get Freon. __ Steve .
You don't understand the difference between a mixture and a chemical compound. __ Steve .
Bill's new science... volume =3D density! That's even better than Pi =3D 3... and explains the supposed 'weightiness' of his scientific posts. Taken by volume, they *are* impressive! __ Steve .
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required