I noticed that they covered such a long spread of time (relative) that they go from silly cheap to megabucks and from starship mileage to once arround the block on Sundays. I know that Toyota/Lexus are knwon for long term reliability but when something goes it costs to get original kit.
So what do you reckon, I might be doing an imperial fuckload more miles than I have been used to (only an extra 50 miles a day but that is more than double what I used to) to too and from one location. Some of that may be spent stationary for hours (motorway jams). As I tend to get back ache in anything I want something a little more comfy for when it is needed.
I could get a jag, but they are a little too oldman and old ones aren't so bombproof and new ones are little too ford. I could get a Merc but old ones are rusty, and new ones break down and hold there price. An Alfa 166 V6 would do, and it would have fully depreciated and they aren't the gamble they once were. but not RWD. I don't want a Beamer I hate the preconceptions of the image, and I only like the M-series and the old 6 and 8 series cars. they also have the "tax" of the badge too. Other choice might be a volvo 7**/9** for peanuts and either a 6 cylinder or 4 cylinder turbo. Or a Range Rover/Discovery, parts cost pennies and clearance to work on everything is amazing. They might breakdown regularly but at least you can do a lot yourself (althought the old ones rust).
I know some of the more hardcore of the drivers here do 40 miles each way in their sleep before breakfast, and I could too if I don't get delays and my back doesn't play up so i just want to protect against that.
Would love an Audi A8 Quattro but I'm still something of a realist. So an LS400 for me I think. What does the panel reckon? I am aware that anything vagually cheap will need a shit load of service/belts/parts for it, no matter how tidy it looks, and I should be prepared to spend whether it is cheap car and parts or expensive car and peace of mind.