Have you read his response(s)?
Evidently, however you fail to have realised that the original comment pointed out a somewhat irony - especially as your .sig is, erm, broken.
I, having read this statement a couple of times now, totally fail to see the logic. It is a bizarre statement and rather indicates that, by the absense of an anti-paedophilia link in your .sig that you are yourself, by implication, a paedophile.
Your response is disproportionate to the posting which your are quoting.
May I introduce you to uk.telecom, or uk.net.news.config or uk.legal or any number of other usenet groups where you, yourself would be thought of as sad, or indeed a f****it - not due to anything you've said (although it would certainly contribute to the belief), but merely by having such a monumentally broken .sig
Best to keep quiet and be thought a f****it than put fingers to keyboard and confirm it to the rest of the world.