I'm not saying we should run away from war against terrorists; I'm saying that being in Iraq is not part of the war against terrorists.
Take some of those troops and put them in Afghanistan to find bin Laden, like we should have done from the beginning instead of the token effort that Bush made.
The dumbshit has had this explained to him MANY times already.
The dumbshit has also had this explained to him MANY times already.
Well, it may be a "part of" the war an terror, a part which has, due to W's complete incompetence, has made things WORSE...
But it sure ain't THE war on terror, which these right-wing assholes seem to have trouble understanding...
You are saying we should run from the terrorists.
Terrorists are in Iraq fighting our soldiers.
You want us to run...
You are a coward.
You are also very dangerous.
bin Laden's people are in Iraq.
You want to run from bin Laden's people?
You are a coward!
That is the worst thing we could do....
It is NOT WORSE!
It is much better.
It IS part of the war on terror...
left wing asshole.....
Yes we are fighting some Iranians in Iraq....but if we don't run like you cowards want us to they won't take over Iraq....
I see Mr. Dizzy (a very apt name ) feels we are fighting Iranians in Iraq that want us out of their country.....
Date, Time and Place.....
You obviously don't understand terrorists.
Cut and run coward.....
Date Time and Place
If the war on terror had a front line, it would be in the Near East and certainly not in Iraq, but it's naive to assume a geographic front line exists.
I take it you've never been in a hostile fire situation.
Time to finally give up wearing those rose-colored glasses & see the starkness of the situation.
Cathy
I'm in a hostile fire situation daily in the ngs.....
An absurd question because Bush has not and will not do nearly enough to win the war because he doesn't understand war and surrounds himself with incompetent yes-men who magnify his deficiencies and delusions.
If it happens it'll be Bush's fault, as almost everything else he's done in the region has helped Iran. Fortunately the takeover won't happen because Persian-ruled Iran doesn't want to rule a population consisting mostly of Arabs.
$7/gal would be painful but not disasterous, considering the low % of GDP spent on oil by developed countries. Our situation would be even better if we hadn't abandoned energy conservation programs in the
1980s or we adopted California standards.
Liar. It's made the terror threat worse, as the experts have acknowledged.
That's what I said, dumbshit. PART, NOT THE.
Lying troll.
Scott is among the small minority left undamaged by the mind-altering fluoride added to our tap water by the communists, as he drinks nothing but pure rain water and grain alcohol, primarily the latter.
Saudi Arabian citizens hijacked and crashed several American passenger jets.
Overwhelmingly, Iraqi citizens.
That wouldn't have happened if we hadn't gone into Iraq.
They already have. Guess why.
If it does, so will the price of gasoline.
With 150,000 troops when 500,000 couldn't do it in Vietnam? Santayana was right, you know. How many more dead? How much bigger a drain on our treasury? How many years will future Americans have to work to pay off Bush's deficits? You people just don't know when you've been suckered.
That was happening before the Iraq war. Long before it, in fact. Do you live in a cave?
As I said, any time (which also means any place); you tell me when you're arriving here, and I'll tell you the place.
Either that, or you can call me a coward as I cross the finish line at the 5K race at Walt Disney World on May 5th.
I obviously understand them a hell of a lot better than you do.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required